RE: [PATCH v4 2/5] dt-bindings: pci: cadence: Extend compatible for new EP configurations

Manikandan Karunakaran Pillai
2025-04-27T03:55:24Z

work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Same applies to the other binding patch.
>>>>> Additionally, since this IP is likely in use on your sky1 SoC, why is a
>>>>> soc-specific compatible for your integration not needed?
>>>>>
>>>> The sky1 SoC support patches will be developed and submitted by the
>Sky1
>>>> team separately.
>>> Why? Cixtech sent this patchset, they should send it with their user.
>>
>> Hi Conor,
>>
>> Please look at the communication history of this website.
>>
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-
>pci/patch/CH2PPF4D26F8E1C1CBD2A866C59AA55CD7AA2A12@CH2PPF4D26F
>8E1C.namprd07.prod.outlook.com/__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!Gh-
>UeyTbbr2R3ocWWa4QZHM_GYBRXws7a5zc3lZvSy_XYVCkcg8mmeEaAWS4wEvI
>SMV2tGCEylE$
>
>And in that thread I asked for Soc specific compatible. More than once.
>Conor asks again.
>
>I don't understand your answers at all.

The current support is for the IP from Cadence. There can be multiple SoC developed based on this IP and it is for
the SoC companies to build in support as and when the SoC support needs to be available.

Since the CIX SoC is available, it can be send together with this patch.
However, I do not understand the need for clubbing these in a single patch.

>
>Best regards,
>Krzysztof