From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: usb: ti,usb8041: Add binding for TI USB8044 hub controller
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 16:53:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250508-waving-sustainer-28fe228e01f8@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <583dc73e-23d3-4c8a-a457-f2bf71190e6a@topic.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 830 bytes --]
On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 05:19:03PM +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> On 08-05-2025 16:58, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 03:11:43PM +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> > > The TI USB8044 is similar to the USB8041.
> > Similar how? Why's a fallback not suitable?
>
> I don't quite understand what is meant by "fallback" here?
A fallback compatible, since you;re using the same match data as the
8041.
> It's similar in that the USB8044 provides the same functionality and can use
> the same driver as the USB8041, all that is needed is to add the PID/VID
> values.
Is this onboard_dev_id_table table with the vid/pid used in combination
with dt, or in-place of dt when device detection is dynamic? If the
latter, why can't dt use a fallback compatible since the handling is
identical to the 8041?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-08 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1b153bce-a66a-45ee-a5c6-963ea6fb1c82.949ef384-8293-46b8-903f-40a477c056ae.3e03400f-766d-4690-8f43-cbea2cac93d8@emailsignatures365.codetwo.com>
[not found] ` <20250507131143.2243079-1-mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
2025-05-07 13:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: usb: ti,usb8041: Add binding for TI USB8044 hub controller Mike Looijmans
2025-05-08 14:58 ` Conor Dooley
2025-05-08 15:19 ` Mike Looijmans
2025-05-08 15:53 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2025-05-09 5:56 ` Mike Looijmans
2025-05-09 15:48 ` Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250508-waving-sustainer-28fe228e01f8@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.looijmans@topic.nl \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox