From: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: PCI: microchip,pcie-host: fix dma coherency property
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 22:06:59 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250516130659.GA2084811@rocinante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250516-datebook-senator-ff7a1c30cbd5@spud>
Hello,
> PolarFire SoC may be configured in a way that requires non-coherent DMA
> handling. On RISC-V, buses are coherent by default & the dma-noncoherent
> property is required to denote buses or devices that are non-coherent.
> For some reason, instead of adding dma-noncoherent to the binding
> the pointless, NOP, property dma-coherent was. Swap dma-coherent for
> dma-noncoherent.
I have favour to ask. Can you capitalise (so-called "title case") the
subject when submitting patches that are PCI-specific DT bindings?
This is the preferred style for PCI, at least at the moment.
Also, it would save us the need to do it every time. :)
Thank you!
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-16 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-16 9:59 [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: PCI: microchip,pcie-host: fix dma coherency property Conor Dooley
2025-05-16 13:06 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński [this message]
2025-05-16 13:56 ` Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250516130659.GA2084811@rocinante \
--to=kw@linux.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=daire.mcnamara@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox