From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (relay7-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 762AB1DE2A8; Mon, 19 May 2025 16:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.200 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747672094; cv=none; b=UfSibXPO93tLVVb0xDC7+E8VoDOCyc82ZzL+29Mk1RL5gSxAsobvaRauWNSf3iDfqdf5LerblTKLyaKPxnf+u/+/vm/LvSrvlGkWXSpefSsqW1/fYTEuhUk8XqW1N7cOJ8Ywi7ohbESsQeVYQyYedv4HpFtAl8rwl6TrmunijvI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747672094; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DZ2lBbr/5MJXipV1uIEvkgdTmipyCV0YFj9m8j9Z2e4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=np2NzjwYhvVpNZjEfNFcwS7nVh+9Q1N/dIMYzNX5AYQdrD/YL0Y6QH9KIDdAEImS34bcebkTLQxV73FfbUhffmOng/JWqMeZYKECXGsbhDwpmsgT1LYe0iIobVG7a0+PakgNsOX8oVHYrnTVz8oZMLNgBISW1uWFQ5m/9FPL/ME= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=QCzgwoSz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.200 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="QCzgwoSz" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7339843959; Mon, 19 May 2025 16:28:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1747672084; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6URoQYvkyARkq+de1O/CjFhagN+Qpuz7SPoxi6whFsw=; b=QCzgwoSzlGB5vwrvQ1ZVP9ydVTuDYM1OFRB48DoP8doFxQvmyt1ArlNphGXSwLVlmTGkcq cRMLQtlcxoLyAkoHP1YycLBl3qb1V8IBZCznf8/L+rhArjrJFFB7d0BdK8F/ZOg4Kiqrur fyj2PLk38D5/kiIxX81cSGAPHrdPaK4gnshejSAMrmCkzi1Cn+WD8nhmrqYkEKhcFx1Hyu a6ble7i9bBUUhToQe8FeYz0j0gRMwlG/B+mVs980YRqIEbxvN6R2Laj2Ak2zbeMv24cIfa Hf1iAMYHvpWzDjjhm/hzaXZOSYr8jwqI0WGWclrbf5Q2AMdB7FO68ttgUNVg7Q== Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 18:28:01 +0200 From: Herve Codina To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Wolfram Sang , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Alim Akhtar , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] arm64: dts: exynos: use proper node names for GPIO based I2C busses Message-ID: <20250519182801.09263bd3@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20250519121512.5657-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20250519121512.5657-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <006ee7d6-1289-4f4a-819d-9a5e5120db99@kernel.org> <3f6e1b74-5d19-4194-b98b-91ab6f10446c@kernel.org> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-GND-State: clean X-GND-Score: -100 X-GND-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdefvddukeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuifetpfffkfdpucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddunecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfgjfhhoofggtgfgsehtkeertdertdejnecuhfhrohhmpefjvghrvhgvucevohguihhnrgcuoehhvghrvhgvrdgtohguihhnrgessghoohhtlhhinhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveeiffefgeeitdelleeigefhjeelueeuveekveetgeffheeltdekgeduiefggfdvnecukfhppeeltddrkeelrdduieefrdduvdejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepledtrdekledrudeifedruddvjedphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhephhgvrhhvvgdrtghoughinhgrsegsohhothhlihhnrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedutddprhgtphhtthhopehkrhiikheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepfihsrgdorhgvnhgvshgrshesshgrnhhgqdgvnhhgihhnvggvrhhinhhgrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqrhgvnhgvshgrshdqshhotgesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehrohgshheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepkhhriihkodgutheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhor hhgpdhrtghpthhtoheptghonhhorhdoughtsehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegrlhhimhdrrghkhhhtrghrsehsrghmshhunhhgrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepuggvvhhitggvthhrvggvsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhg X-GND-Sasl: herve.codina@bootlin.com On Mon, 19 May 2025 18:11:29 +0200 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 19/05/2025 17:14, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > >> ... so clearly the suffix is "-foo" or "-0", as we usually prefer. This > >> should be replaced into i2c-X, by dropping "gpio", instead of using less > >> favored suffixing (one without -). > > > > Hmm, I can't automate this because it will then need to be aligned with > > the bus numbering of other existing non-GPIO-busses. Which is highly > > individual per board. That means we need to drop this series? > > I think either we use i2c-X or commit 57138f5b8c92 ("schemas: i2c: Avoid > extra characters in i2c nodename pattern") from Herve was not correct > and needs to be fixed. > I don't know if relevant for this case but Rob did the fix 647181a ("schemas: i2c: Allow for 'i2c-.*' node names") on top of my commit. Best regards, Hervé