From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B08251E00B4; Sat, 24 May 2025 10:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748084392; cv=none; b=j6soKpSmMi5AW5w5du0aeNeAsHMrjg0JCIWdA1KHH6XfWYwdd5X0RdTyyCma7HLhdTzCjBp0j/GFot1I7B7mHhDVOvLX2gbEwIMqA3buQhyelW1IEvIRbQRjtcPiIXUIMlBiWcrZL7Uj/c0bd9vLaj4CHZkQJ3xExax8kOQ+LQ4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748084392; c=relaxed/simple; bh=am5CZEL1GEppvkfskPtSLJbGMlXiDh88jJ3Sw8xP1P4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=aReJM3QjIighwV4kMg1SUgVY4gkGFeQW5oiT4Kq85LtOzBjfLRpjbk4NLTUgoxUNIfmIMpqIaCTQu3gG6PDcJH591zjO1GTTWmHCTcfd+FpHDG7TpUAOXf00yJ0AyihVsiX9IwUFV4+DmMAipkPaBDP94C0v3yBTBeCH8LQ2Gjo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=UmwZttNc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="UmwZttNc" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1748084391; x=1779620391; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=am5CZEL1GEppvkfskPtSLJbGMlXiDh88jJ3Sw8xP1P4=; b=UmwZttNcnl2Zt83w+7d6ouTmtfLt1x45j1Y2Igb/NvLCrGnJqoSq3JFa Pvsu6Lx0HCXh6lqWLwceJfvpMyGW+9FmfLpSkSp0WzQC5Sktok4knD6A5 CN/he9kKSM1TswA930TD6bhtFq7/2DI8qDI7j7g+b+k60Ig04/XF7YunL wbCsryUxR8nC0MJ7r7rHK7cEf1Iofq2fjH2zJlZTCAHdegeC/9yXgHoO/ x09sw0y7fScabf7WVaROIt2mblox+iS9L6uNezTWLuiKkR+DJ708NL3s7 Z1ktNIZnTEz9Mt5w1gNMRGsWRQaZs0FemcjTaHXZLPWLwkTw07UHZAnud g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ggJqbRMvRbCc9CDJ9DxGrQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: TmHZa4QuSy+DoxFgJh5teg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11441"; a="61532494" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,311,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="61532494" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 May 2025 03:59:50 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: aEIjQGFITtieISE43Lb8Wg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: dDtghmnrRTmokGr6y73H6w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,311,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="146509247" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 1992f890471c) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 May 2025 03:59:46 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 1992f890471c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uImbQ-000R8u-1K; Sat, 24 May 2025 10:59:44 +0000 Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 18:59:35 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Elaine Zhang , mkl@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de, cl@rock-chips.com, kever.yang@rock-chips.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] net: can: rockchip: Refactor the rkcanfd_devtype_data structure Message-ID: <202505241818.tw02Bia6-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250523075422.4010083-3-zhangqing@rock-chips.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250523075422.4010083-3-zhangqing@rock-chips.com> Hi Elaine, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on mkl-can-next/testing] [also build test WARNING on robh/for-next linus/master v6.15-rc7 next-20250523] [cannot apply to rockchip/for-next] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Elaine-Zhang/dt-bindings-can-rockchip_canfd-add-rk3576-CAN-FD-controller/20250523-211340 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can-next.git testing patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250523075422.4010083-3-zhangqing%40rock-chips.com patch subject: [PATCH v5 2/4] net: can: rockchip: Refactor the rkcanfd_devtype_data structure config: loongarch-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250524/202505241818.tw02Bia6-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250524/202505241818.tw02Bia6-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505241818.tw02Bia6-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd-core.c:25: >> drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd.h:439:29: warning: 'priv' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] 439 | static struct rkcanfd_priv *priv; | ^~~~ vim +/priv +439 drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd.h 438 > 439 static struct rkcanfd_priv *priv; 440 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki