From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40F9F482EB; Sat, 31 May 2025 05:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748670749; cv=none; b=VFvg7i0TsULXw4LcC00zIn1NLlVE1yCwzmNNzGra+ZtpZy7cL1Cj+QqhAN4bfz0+zaYVcqnkre+ZOu7Y+NItoxIZTw9AdzkP0AWVTjqVyTB6kcqBCzDaRW+DFeOVHqLyiRWiyi+HnyLSG0refi3teST7sYIjm+juYi1fVOSr6Ww= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748670749; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cALAC45bcmWERtlmr7LoJYVyMgKP9/CIORLyNtIJDTo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XVXrK0bAJI+strxnzFOCznONAlt3JUoELwj5wVGpDpG8rvH76PAwjqxhsHJvF8gaw1dAoE4VJAilgjGSVMK+t3xndfX6XAsc47AoqxjHKEK7v85zxHn4NwcUumlrHK8djGyR1PeaecpbTZ3fRUwJtobDr0USdDATlVd2l+HcR2U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=BBWe77Ry; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="BBWe77Ry" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11D52C4CEE3; Sat, 31 May 2025 05:52:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1748670748; bh=cALAC45bcmWERtlmr7LoJYVyMgKP9/CIORLyNtIJDTo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BBWe77RykKrSJXfko9OgPsygLKF6tjS8vhKXHLKhBdQrJtrdN6bhd9areOJ/wj+U+ qBJYns24X8rDCbSdzvbZHJx6NMv7qt0hJnX3c2M5t4KBzB+Nq+TEzvQjPm/wwQiky1 zOb2NinsAuY2zsMl2sfINgff+ZCp/HDMbBACbPm4= Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 07:52:25 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "Vankar, Chintan" Cc: Conor Dooley , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Peter Rosin , s-vadapalli@ti.com, danishanwar@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Vignesh Raghavendra , Nishanth Menon , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Extend mmio-mux driver to configure mux with new DT property Message-ID: <2025053128-profound-importer-8436@gregkh> References: <20250304102306.2977836-1-c-vankar@ti.com> <2e80f6bc-2fb0-4f0d-9450-cbcf4dddca66@ti.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2e80f6bc-2fb0-4f0d-9450-cbcf4dddca66@ti.com> On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 10:35:24PM +0530, Vankar, Chintan wrote: > Hello Greg, > > I have tried to implement Timesync Router node to the suitable > Subsystems (Interrupt controller and Mux-controller). Thomas > has provided a feedback with a reason why Timesync Router is not > suitable for irqchip. But I didn't get a proper feedback for mux- > controller subsystem. What do you mean "proper feedback"? > Can you please help me deciding in which subsystem I should implement > it, if not mux-controller can it go in drivers/misc ? Why not mux? What's preventing that from happening? Why would misc be better? thanks, greg k-h