Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: regulator: Add Richtek RTR5133 DT Binding Documentation

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 02:01:35PM +0800, jeff_chang@richtek.com wrote:
> From: Jeff Chang <jeff_chang@richtek.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Chang <jeff_chang@richtek.com>
> ---
> 
> PATCH v3
> 1. fix Subject format
> 2. using correct patches version
> 3. remove '|'
> 4. remove allOf: &ref regulator.yaml#
> 5. remove redundant description
> 6. move BASE to base property with correct indentation
> 7. only using lowercase node name
> 8. make DT_CHECKER_FLAG=-m DT_SCHEMA_FILES=richtek,rt5133.yaml dt_binding_check pass
> 
> 
>  .../bindings/regulator/richtek,rt5133.yaml    | 197 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 197 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/richtek,rt5133.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/richtek,rt5133.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/richtek,rt5133.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a92e7f775832
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/richtek,rt5133.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/regulator/richtek,rt5133.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Richtek RT5133 PMIC Regulator
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - ShihChia Chang <jeff_chang@richtek.com>
> +
> +description:
> +  RT5133 is an integrated chip. It includes 8 LDOs and 3 GPOs that can be
> +  used to drive output high/low purpose. The dependency of the GPO block
> +  is internally LDO1 Voltage. If LDO1 voltage output disabled, GPO cannot
> +  be used to drive output high. It need to pay more attention on the usage.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - richtek,rt5133
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  enable-gpios:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  wakeup-source: true
> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  gpio-controller: true
> +
> +  "#gpio-cells":
> +    const: 2
> +
> +  regulators:
> +    type: object
> +    additionalProperties: false
> +
> +    properties:
> +      base:
> +        type: object
> +        $ref: regulator.yaml#
> +        unevaluatedProperties: false
> +        description:
> +          Properties for base regulator which for force-off base circuit
> +
> +        properties:
> +          regulator-compatible:

regulator-compatible was deprecated so long ago we don't even document 
it now. Why are you bringing it back?

> +            description: Compatible string for regulator
> +            $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> +
> +          oc-shutdown-all:
> +            type: boolean
> +            description:
> +              Anyone of LDO OC state, shut down all channels.
> +
> +          pgb-shutdown-all:
> +            type: boolean
> +            description:
> +              Anyone of PGB OC state, shut down all channels.

Is 'base' an actual regulator or are these just common properties for 
all regulators? If the latter, then just move them up a level and add a 
vendor prefix.

Rob