From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D49F1E9B22; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 23:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753484637; cv=none; b=GGQA8mahyTOaJuvjULmZa3799SEhX0Gyg84WuJhhBhIHQu3KM54ehdP9W1MUTiifhx7eRNxnPFC279dt3/w0G+JWaT5lJ8bhSxLCCN8zvt4snooS6mU8l9ZHiHX/zer6MizqFsKKk6TqWwFYw7kvP3ek7ju4fqRU6gwf0BGQ9pU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753484637; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/ihqXbiLnvze8X7uQMIFreBNaBY/ADD8BZyIiZGUufc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ULxIIKoc0ZXFBA9FJwz3zGro48vZATuYeVK/OqjBfeKTi1IVIlr3yqYhvvhicNSbV+6lWuGElW+YjKog0N7WWecWK5ZfhydsV2RTeiJx+KF5kJ/I7PUG2tg341voRVbIh7hmtiWaKqitI7MYCmt4cb1dpQHQMG5Myn9+cB1pasA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FEXjstUO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FEXjstUO" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92499C4CEE7; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 23:03:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1753484636; bh=/ihqXbiLnvze8X7uQMIFreBNaBY/ADD8BZyIiZGUufc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FEXjstUOI0TN9HQBSTBwqbatkXGLTR8j38MRH0gaYGIjujVkhVpmcdbrufiYTszqh ixhIl1p7DSDHg+eXdv19MOviwgiL6yDT3Sdfr9UvFsaDUwIURonuKLJ4buX0FqURKj vJDuCcW94BuqQ2EeIuKROn1vn3TyYKszJkmmbyqApPir9CHfxOO/XqucVDJnSRazip 9Nzcwxa+Yf3rEBR3wHIxoOYkXz4bnce80LHQaI7vkxojkbhp7CKUyO+pus/y705TKF uWbYGINWxygVgHZH6wPF4H5nP+zOhZzq5vqqSUqJ/HLOI3kS82hUx6KZ4mpYuuo0zO N/mMYbJxHCwtw== Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 18:03:55 -0500 From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" To: Jonas Karlman Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Yao Zi , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, Vinod Koul , Chukun Pan Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,inno-usb2phy: Require GRF for RK3568/RV1108 Message-ID: <20250725230355.GB1993803-robh@kernel.org> References: <20250723122323.2344916-1-jonas@kwiboo.se> <20250723122323.2344916-2-jonas@kwiboo.se> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250723122323.2344916-2-jonas@kwiboo.se> On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 12:22:59 +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote: > Typically these Rockchip USB2 PHYs are fully contained within a single > GRF. However, for RK3568 and RV1108 regs to control the USB2 PHY is > located in a different GRF compared to the base address. > > Update this binding to require rockchip,usbgrf for RK3568 and RV1108 to > properly reflect that the USB GRF is required to control the USB2 PHYs > on these variants. Also disable use of rockchip,usbgrf for variants > where it is not required. > > This should not introduce any breakage as the affected usb2phy nodes for > RK3568 and RV1108 were added together with a rockchip,usbgrf phandle in > their initial commit. > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman > --- > .../bindings/phy/rockchip,inno-usb2phy.yaml | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm)