Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Basic device tree support for ESWIN EIC7700 RISC-V SoC

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1320 bytes --]

On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 04:45:10PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/08/2025 15:10, Pinkesh Vaghela wrote:
> > Hello Krzysztof,
> > 
> > Sorry to bother you. I pinged because we addressed all the review comments of V3 in V4. But on V4 we have not received any comments since last 6 weeks.
> > Could you please let us know what should be the further steps?
> 
> Please don't top post.
> 
> That is a bit different question than you asked before: "Gentle reminder
> to review DT patches.".
> 
> Please read SoC subsystem maintainer profile document. For ARM platforms
> you would send now pull request or patches to soc.
> 
> I would suggest following standard SoC way, same as for every other new
> SoC (but carefully observe the kernel process cycle). You can easily
> check archives to see how people also did it...

Yes, standard SoC way please. Arnd expressed recently a preference for
the initial series for a new SoC vendor to go as a patchset to
soc@lists.linux.dev rather than as a pull-request.

> For RISC-V - not sure
> some trees are handled by Conor, but rest go directly to soc tree.

I'm only doing the canaan/sifive/microchip/starfive ones that were there
when I started, all the "new" platforms have dedicated maintainers that
send direct to Arnd.

Cheers,
Conor.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]