From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF7CD28136B; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 17:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754414033; cv=none; b=SoFgf1pW1b/WDR+M1o0vKvVF0M7prV7WN8B94/s8xg41e/BdMmJvjscO55H5HVBfottnh1RfPSOnMsbaCn3uK/0Pk1VaMcDyZzHSQHCNcLYAZ9bTs//BPCt1di6bXxb0kd5myhcc3KFGC7E6oYA94LxdTwf/77KQh8Zjj/DUIf4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754414033; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kFLtP7kLi6TZXaFEe1UXPz9zTqnkNWTqbzGcM1j1sPw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ksCahA2xgyHdjYUpta+9LbxEw1HXr7p6xrhSfxeLKUT3ugGZXrXrvqsz9VRi020FTQ/nbT0lFyZHjeK+53CeJy3HKe8Up4m9mG6VqOTr75J2Lm4KtbTgOBOsR6VPtDeev/Wms3DUehV+FL9JQyFwfWhsFiSBrpbz8222CFB2AFw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mzsjP5ci; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mzsjP5ci" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFFE6C4CEF0; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 17:13:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1754414033; bh=kFLtP7kLi6TZXaFEe1UXPz9zTqnkNWTqbzGcM1j1sPw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mzsjP5ciz19VA8OYXPXGI3ps14D5SxS7bD9pxYQPAycE7Y4pHpSw4SS0UcE7MZLJK T0nkWr8PsG/9TjOF1GRpxVkvzT7db4zoXaZdRtioihy15x5sVlSB8Bs7VFkS4USG+H Jh8TXTGLuuhc2eWztbTmwYGT/92FpvmiC7XnpNWVLkRkIATERWrsm+4LumZ0x/SisN 2Gugtnz8V8UuBGzMQgNBJ2r7eA4Qo27++wMMC4E07nPsGl+UN4J0Ds/hvhUs0pb2M1 GPJCs5jNFr05si0U+WdLxZcTfZde5GzbWAjEOalxyRTUAQY34FeGxmnKczRm4z5JzF 8oifLKq6fY5+w== Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 18:13:47 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Gabriel FERNANDEZ Cc: sboyd@kernel.org, Conor Dooley , Daire McNamara , pierre-henry.moussay@microchip.com, valentina.fernandezalanis@microchip.com, Michael Turquette , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Jassi Brar , Lee Jones , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Philipp Zabel , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] clk: divider, gate: create regmap-backed copies of gate and divider clocks Message-ID: <20250805-slit-scrunch-e19f8afec16d@spud> References: <20250623-levitate-nugget-08c9a01f401d@spud> <20250623-spleen-rambling-8bd898f2788e@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9zeZAJc7XAA2HBY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --M9zeZAJc7XAA2HBY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 01:23:49PM +0200, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote: >=20 > On 6/23/25 14:56, Conor Dooley wrote: > > From: Conor Dooley > >=20 > > Implement regmap-backed copies of gate and divider clocks by replacing > > the iomem pointer to the clock registers with a regmap and offset > > within. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley >=20 > Hi Conor, >=20 > Excellent patch, thank you! I really needed this and will be using it. >=20 > I would also be interested in having a similar regmap-backed implementati= on > for the multiplexer clock.=C2=A0 Do you have any plans to work on this as= well? > If not, I=E2=80=99d be happy to propose a patch for it, with your agreeme= nt. The only types of clock my driver needed were gate and divider, so those were all I focused on. I don't really have a plan to implement more, particular given the lack of feedback here means that I don't even know if what I have done is what Stephen wants. The rest of your comments seem reasonable, and I'll try to implement them in a new version. --M9zeZAJc7XAA2HBY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCaJI7ywAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0sR1AP4zQnrLebu8U863VAtOFHm+6M8gEW/WnUp3VMypOqgoIAEA6d9iEeY01BHW S8o+uJeKAfF5/WvpbXoU0kZQT2osNwQ= =urpw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9zeZAJc7XAA2HBY--