From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Akhilesh Patil <akhilesh@ee.iitb.ac.in>
Cc: krzk+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akhileshpatilvnit@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] rtc: m41t93: fix device connection/detection logic during probe
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 16:47:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025090314472377b79cdf@mail.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c3deec9e679cd4e4a49a2cc1cba340c552faefdc.1756908788.git.akhilesh@ee.iitb.ac.in>
On 03/09/2025 19:57:21+0530, Akhilesh Patil wrote:
> Fix the incorrect assumption about WDAY register (0x4) bits 3 to 7
> being 0 after initial power-on to test response from device during probe
>
> Do not expect these bits to be 0 after power on as datasheet does not
> explicitly mention these power on defaults but recommends software to
> clear these bits during operation. Refer section 3.15 for initial
> power-on default bits.
>
> Fix the random probe failures after power on by removing this condition
> check. Add alternate response check logic which performs write, read,
> compare check on device SRAM register to check device connection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akhilesh Patil <akhilesh@ee.iitb.ac.in>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t93.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t93.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t93.c
> index 8cc179e08a4a..902797070246 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t93.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t93.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #define M41T93_BIT_A1IE BIT(7)
> #define M41T93_BIT_ABE BIT(5)
> #define M41T93_FLAG_AF1 BIT(6)
> +#define M41T93_SRAM_BASE 0x19
>
>
> #define M41T93_REG_ALM_HOUR_HT 0xc
> @@ -290,17 +291,25 @@ static int m41t93_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> return PTR_ERR(m41t93->regmap);
> }
>
> - ret = regmap_read(m41t93->regmap, M41T93_REG_WDAY, &res);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> + ret = regmap_write(m41t93->regmap, M41T93_SRAM_BASE, 0xA5);
Nope, probe is not called at RTC power on but when linux starts. The
whole point of the RTC is to survive Linux. Writing to this register is
breaking functionnality.
> + if (ret) {
> dev_err(&spi->dev, "IO error\n");
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> - if (res < 0 || (res & 0xf8) != 0) {
> - dev_err(&spi->dev, "not found 0x%x.\n", res);
> + ret = regmap_read(m41t93->regmap, M41T93_SRAM_BASE, &res);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "IO error\n");
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + if (res != 0xA5) {
> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "No valid response from device 0x%x.\n", res);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> + dev_notice(&spi->dev, "m41t93 device response success\n");
> +
This is too verbose.
> spi_set_drvdata(spi, m41t93);
>
> m41t93->rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&spi->dev, m41t93_driver.driver.name,
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-03 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-03 14:23 [PATCH 0/7] rtc: m41t93: add new features alarm, clock out, watchdog Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 1/7] rtc: m41t93: add device tree support Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: rtc: add bindings for m41t93 Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-03 14:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-09 11:44 ` Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-03 20:33 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-09-03 14:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] rtc: m41t93: migrate to regmap api for register access Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-03 14:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] rtc: m41t93: Add alarm support Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-04 5:07 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-03 14:27 ` [PATCH 5/7] rtc: m41t93: fix device connection/detection logic during probe Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-03 14:47 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2025-09-09 12:12 ` Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-03 14:27 ` [PATCH 6/7] rtc: m41t93: Add square wave clock provider support Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-04 4:42 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-03 14:28 ` [PATCH 7/7] rtc: m41t93: Add watchdog support Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-04 23:23 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025090314472377b79cdf@mail.local \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=akhilesh@ee.iitb.ac.in \
--cc=akhileshpatilvnit@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).