devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Akhilesh Patil <akhilesh@ee.iitb.ac.in>
Cc: krzk+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akhileshpatilvnit@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] rtc: m41t93: fix device connection/detection logic during probe
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 16:47:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025090314472377b79cdf@mail.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c3deec9e679cd4e4a49a2cc1cba340c552faefdc.1756908788.git.akhilesh@ee.iitb.ac.in>

On 03/09/2025 19:57:21+0530, Akhilesh Patil wrote:
> Fix the incorrect assumption about WDAY register (0x4) bits 3 to 7
> being 0 after initial power-on to test response from device during probe
> 
> Do not expect these bits to be 0 after power on as datasheet does not
> explicitly mention these power on defaults but recommends software to
> clear these bits during operation. Refer section 3.15 for initial
> power-on default bits.
> 
> Fix the random probe failures after power on by removing this condition
> check. Add alternate response check logic which performs write, read,
> compare check on device SRAM register to check device connection.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akhilesh Patil <akhilesh@ee.iitb.ac.in>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t93.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t93.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t93.c
> index 8cc179e08a4a..902797070246 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t93.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t93.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>  #define M41T93_BIT_A1IE                 BIT(7)
>  #define M41T93_BIT_ABE			BIT(5)
>  #define M41T93_FLAG_AF1                 BIT(6)
> +#define M41T93_SRAM_BASE		0x19
>  
>  
>  #define M41T93_REG_ALM_HOUR_HT		0xc
> @@ -290,17 +291,25 @@ static int m41t93_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  		return PTR_ERR(m41t93->regmap);
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = regmap_read(m41t93->regmap, M41T93_REG_WDAY, &res);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> +	ret = regmap_write(m41t93->regmap, M41T93_SRAM_BASE, 0xA5);

Nope, probe is not called at RTC power on but when linux starts. The
whole point of the RTC is to survive Linux. Writing to this register is
breaking functionnality.

> +	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&spi->dev, "IO error\n");
>  		return -EIO;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (res < 0 || (res & 0xf8) != 0) {
> -		dev_err(&spi->dev, "not found 0x%x.\n", res);
> +	ret = regmap_read(m41t93->regmap, M41T93_SRAM_BASE, &res);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&spi->dev, "IO error\n");
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (res != 0xA5) {
> +		dev_err(&spi->dev, "No valid response from device 0x%x.\n", res);
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
> +	dev_notice(&spi->dev, "m41t93 device response success\n");
> +

This is too verbose.

>  	spi_set_drvdata(spi, m41t93);
>  
>  	m41t93->rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&spi->dev, m41t93_driver.driver.name,
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-03 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-03 14:23 [PATCH 0/7] rtc: m41t93: add new features alarm, clock out, watchdog Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 1/7] rtc: m41t93: add device tree support Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: rtc: add bindings for m41t93 Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-03 14:30   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-09 11:44     ` Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-03 20:33   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-09-03 14:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] rtc: m41t93: migrate to regmap api for register access Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-03 14:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] rtc: m41t93: Add alarm support Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-04  5:07   ` kernel test robot
2025-09-03 14:27 ` [PATCH 5/7] rtc: m41t93: fix device connection/detection logic during probe Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-03 14:47   ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2025-09-09 12:12     ` Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-03 14:27 ` [PATCH 6/7] rtc: m41t93: Add square wave clock provider support Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-04  4:42   ` kernel test robot
2025-09-03 14:28 ` [PATCH 7/7] rtc: m41t93: Add watchdog support Akhilesh Patil
2025-09-04 23:23   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025090314472377b79cdf@mail.local \
    --to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=akhilesh@ee.iitb.ac.in \
    --cc=akhileshpatilvnit@gmail.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).