From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60DC01758B; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 06:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756965767; cv=none; b=hUlaIRxWSeztqPj+ogz/dmNtKbonVtVhyHaYkN3kVYJHGO3VHRnOiYSWZgZ1+Qrn98OBSDyx4hAvZZrEWcOS0SqJTcKjdlcFrOFfLaB86p3yW9t788EF4HYu4Q4KRaapMQk8JYBqiWqpoV/iRioeTWYvO09pqkqVltCRau+5L+A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756965767; c=relaxed/simple; bh=090gkLICbGM7TNk6kExYlvvMe+p36xr/EilWtJfF52g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RsXTyR37y5BAEJa1KoPs0f9sDkUCA9+inGYdFTjEeCb8chqBU0WUxgBxCOKIR7qShmdAT2GAlF70vudPyuUpT7gzwl4d/Fs9CszLM+FrcMTNGIlCEgbjQtZNw6IADVs6lIEy2gk+uewiEJ/lmQ/RCGa5EHuLjXYrKVwVpPmhbNw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=YbFApHCM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="YbFApHCM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1756965763; bh=090gkLICbGM7TNk6kExYlvvMe+p36xr/EilWtJfF52g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YbFApHCMtpPV7aWtDBimSagK7GUlxOLsVOhn2efk4y6D7WTKDqaDKNVh2Qw5HJa49 YT9K5uzYEUyhQS4tVDJXDUPkez3c6hNvH38OH/cZNvjSnvu7ia4Ij18GA5LV6Nq6aV dkR5BklGOP+AfqjjFFrWhxfvzfXqo76Pd/BqUJsAJtyPWxrIv0x2N1PJvUHzlOrleY wn/HCFCbSnr/lLPiHhxWv/EvkVBbjTFRlzLfvnUDjmh3oNbYKqXK9g1nFX8YYFBd8I L2b6AYtvTLSQAsH+Kj07nc0Q6XsBsZR+CrMse/+ajzchGiixuDRRdt6isiKPzCRsTG nTvYqllWSba2A== Received: from fedora (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:2c:6930:d919:a6e:5ea1:8a9f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bbrezillon) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A221A17E0EB8; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 08:02:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 08:02:39 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Chia-I Wu Cc: Steven Price , Liviu Dudau , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] drm/panthor: add initial mt8196 support Message-ID: <20250904080239.779b5e24@fedora> In-Reply-To: <20250903225504.542268-3-olvaffe@gmail.com> References: <20250903225504.542268-1-olvaffe@gmail.com> <20250903225504.542268-3-olvaffe@gmail.com> Organization: Collabora X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.49; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 3 Sep 2025 15:55:04 -0700 Chia-I Wu wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/Makefile > index 02db21748c125..75e92c461304b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/Makefile > @@ -12,4 +12,6 @@ panthor-y := \ > panthor_mmu.o \ > panthor_sched.o > > +panthor-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANTHOR_SOC_MT8196) += panthor_soc_mt8196.o Based on the stuff you describe (ASN hash, core mask read from an nvmem cell, extra clks/regulators?), I don't think we need per-soc source files and per-soc config options. If it becomes too HW specific (no abstraction to make it SoC-agnostic), we can reconsider the per-SoC file approach, but I believe it can all live in panthor_drv.c for now.