From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail11.truemail.it (mail11.truemail.it [217.194.8.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D51727A906; Mon, 8 Sep 2025 19:23:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757359402; cv=none; b=sSdYoz1FKj+1RILcdnZv2GegXnuhqxXIMRLWDy8JrQ0ETxqlwWVE6q3TwYf7zSsDb8temCFWhfAAdKSfyGWDrCyELX0bPisvTmNkd1GiTSFDyvEGCkxKC5FWxe7wA73/QiJHFHuyzqgICG5EPf1R0iNOgtYLO7UoSdq4SpWuGZU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757359402; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Kj+U1UniU/Kvc8yHAJyifBQNCQvgC0UBsXIUp8Lo78o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=f5vo23eZQvy6dgfTiDLx/dt167g1lSq18Gszns6E9G48URAAblAVvEMEoZcn+dj+1UE+Z9xKwk/sVNiF7RpUZasACRF2XuXgvHfjimKQzRGcMk4+eyA9ix5j69y9Gs7BI35DyMju8l14E1s0ZWtqrkyPSYbcExSyN+DxhMeePCo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b=j1Fm6Hel; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b="j1Fm6Hel" Received: from francesco-nb (xdsl-188-155-97-38.adslplus.ch [188.155.97.38]) by mail11.truemail.it (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 75263233E8; Mon, 8 Sep 2025 21:23:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dolcini.it; s=default; t=1757359395; bh=TSFMz1YsRrecVdcFsDR2zMYv9+JcraECHD1VyUZRDF8=; h=From:To:Subject; b=j1Fm6HelbfVbg7SK5RjhBl2NR05zf+V/t89C6ar3l+BQ8F5E8tu1hNAvi0IYcD1Bz TgbeG1pXuw/t87/CbnuPMQVu7aB5GEds2LxUQSndzxJl1Uz2bcN6RPqcUPOflKimkB TucXL8JW0H8XyDEA6hO2DMUWEmAZrka1dNsZpN+fLqb+eLVF2qTzgvBGfPTXFnpuy7 tf3sgMHRAMw/sbNsJ1V8Rrn/3zg+acU1bTkWT38hZIpvutVk9b26aFb7Uy/otU9sBG iBEIgOUy54m2YOaw48kaj+KHoAUUZu1WjUtO7WCZ8sHDK7s+b322K1Gf/OtNWT+cI0 0mh4JvxlZfE0Q== Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 21:23:13 +0200 From: Francesco Dolcini To: Beleswar Padhi Cc: nm@ti.com, vigneshr@ti.com, kristo@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, afd@ti.com, u-kumar1@ti.com, hnagalla@ti.com, jm@ti.com, d-gole@ti.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Francesco Dolcini , Robert Nelson , Jo_o Paulo Gon_alves , Parth Pancholi , Emanuele Ghidoli , Matthias Schiffer , Logan Bristol , Josua Mayer , John Ma , Nathan Morrisson , Garrett Giordano , Matt McKee , Wadim Egorov , Andrejs Cainikovs , Max Krummenacher , Stefan Eichenberger , Hiago De Franco , Diogo Ivo , Li Hua Qian , Jan Kiszka , Baocheng Su , Benedikt Niedermayr Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/34] arm64: dts: ti: k3: Rename rproc reserved-mem nodes to 'memory@addr' Message-ID: <20250908192313.GC4217@francesco-nb> References: <20250908142826.1828676-1-b-padhi@ti.com> <20250908142826.1828676-14-b-padhi@ti.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250908142826.1828676-14-b-padhi@ti.com> On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 07:58:05PM +0530, Beleswar Padhi wrote: > Currently, the reserved memory carveouts used by remote processors are > named like 'rproc-name--memory-region@addr'. While it is > descriptive, the node label already serves that purpose. Rename reserved > memory nodes to generic 'memory@addr' to align with the device tree > specifications. This is done for all TI K3 based boards. > > Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi Reviewed-by: Francesco Dolcini