Re: [PATCH phy 13/14] dt-bindings: phy: lynx-28g: add compatible strings per SerDes and instantiation

[Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>]

On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 07:35:43PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 02:35:43PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 04:04:45PM +0000, Josua Mayer wrote:
> > > Am 08.09.25 um 17:37 schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 02:02:35PM +0000, Josua Mayer wrote:
> > > >>> My updated plan is to describe the schema rules for the compatible as
> > > >>> follows. Is that ok with everyone?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> properties:
> > > >>>   compatible:
> > > >>>     oneOf:
> > > >>>       - const: fsl,lynx-28g
> > > >>>         deprecated: true
> > > >>>       - items:
> > > >>>           - const: fsl,lx2160a-serdes1
> > > >>>           - const: fsl,lynx-28g
> > > >>>       - enum:
> > > missed fsl,lx2160a-serdes1
> > 
> > I didn't miss anything. "fsl,lx2160a-serdes1" is deliberately not in
> > "enum" because there's no point specifying this compatible as
> > standalone, if for backwards compatibility reasons it will always have
> > to be "fsl,lx2160a-serdes1", "fsl,lynx-28g" (it was described as
> > "fsl,lynx-28g" before), which is already covered by "items".
> 
> I think Josua was pointing out their own omission here.

Maybe, but the quoted text was my proposal.