From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Ayush Singh <ayush@beagleboard.org>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Jason Kridner <jkridner@gmail.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree-compiler@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Subject: Re: Device tree representation of (hotplug) connectors: discussion at ELCE
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 15:58:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250911155842.796c47fa@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdULiX83n5bLEipE1j99HyuyXCpAYS9qYu-8y_vmEyO_ag@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 15:08:33 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Hervé,
>
> On Thu, 11 Sept 2025 at 14:45, Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 17:45:17 +0530
> > Ayush Singh <ayush@beagleboard.org> wrote:
> > > On 9/11/25 15:53, Herve Codina wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 10:54:02 +0200
> > > > Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > > >> On Thu, 11 Sept 2025 at 10:48, Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > > >>> The choice to map connA to the type 'foo' connector expected by the addon
> > > >>> and the choice to map connB or connC to the type 'bar' connector expected by
> > > >>> the addon can only be done at runtime and probably with the help of a driver
> > > >>> that have the knowledge of the 3 connectors.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I have the feeling that the choice of physical connectors to which the addon
> > > >>> board is connected to is a human choice when the board is connected.
> > > >> All these choices and decisions apply to single-connector add-on boards, too.
> > > >>
> > > > Yes, in our use case (me and Luca), each addon has an eeprom, wired exactly the
> > > > same on all supported addon, which allows to known the exact addon. Also addon
> > > > insertions and removals are detected using some gpios wired to the connector.
> > > >
> > > > Based on that our specific driver handling our specific connector perform the
> > > > following operations on addon insertion detection:
> > > > - load a first addon DT to have access to the eeprom
> > > > - Read the eeprom to determine the addon type
> > > > - load the DT matching with the addon type
> > > >
> > > > This part is of course connector type specific. I mean having an eeprom with
> > > > some encoded addon type values and hotplug detection with gpio is a part of
> > > > the contract between the board and the addon (part of connector specification).
> > >
> > > My usecase is a bit more complicated, since I am trying to model all the
> > > available headers on BeagleBoard.org sbcs (particularly PocketBeagle 2
> > > initially) as connectors. However, that still ends up being a single
> > > connector which can have multiple addon-boards simultaneously instead of
> > > the other way around.
> >
> > In that case, a connector cannot have the state "free" or "used" handled
> > globally by a core part.
> >
> > IMHO, each connector drivers should handle this kind of state if relevant.
> > I mean, in case of "pmods" compatible driver having this state per PMOD
> > connector could make sense whereas in "beagle-connector" it doesn't.
>
> It depends on whether the add-on board has stacking headers, or not ;-)
>
> > Also, on my side, with my 2-step DT loading, the first loading should not
> > consider the connector as 'used'.
> >
> > All of that is implied by the "contract" between the board and the addon.
> > It is connector specific and so should be handled by the specific connector
> > driver itself.
>
> Since stacking boards is a fairly common use case (beagle, rpi), perhaps
> it makes sense to have a simple method to re-export / forward a connector?
> The alternative would be to re-describe and re-export everything.
You re-apply an addon DT on the same connector. You should see the exact same
symbols without re-exporting anything.
I think that you have to re-export stuff only if, on the addon board itself,
you wire some pins from one connector to an other one.
+-----------------------------+
| Addon board |
+---------+ +--------+
+ conn A +-------------------+ conn B +
+ +--, +--------+ +--------+
+---------+ '--+ device | |
| +--------+ |
+-----------------------------+
Here the resource available at conn A directly wired to conn B should be
re-exported in order to allow another addon connected to conn B to use this
signal.
Multiple addons with conn A connector stacked should see all symbols exported
from the based board related to conn A.
Best regards,
Hervé
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-11 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-02 8:57 Device tree representation of (hotplug) connectors: discussion at ELCE Luca Ceresoli
2025-09-04 5:23 ` David Gibson
2025-09-04 5:45 ` Ayush Singh
2025-09-08 4:36 ` David Gibson
2025-09-08 9:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-09 2:44 ` David Gibson
2025-09-08 12:51 ` Herve Codina
2025-09-09 5:09 ` David Gibson
2025-09-09 9:41 ` Herve Codina
2025-09-09 13:04 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-10 4:36 ` David Gibson
2025-09-11 10:11 ` Herve Codina
2025-09-12 9:40 ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-09-10 4:33 ` David Gibson
2025-09-11 8:48 ` Herve Codina
2025-09-11 8:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-11 10:23 ` Herve Codina
2025-09-11 12:15 ` Ayush Singh
2025-09-11 12:45 ` Herve Codina
2025-09-11 13:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-11 13:58 ` Herve Codina [this message]
2025-09-15 4:51 ` David Gibson
2025-09-16 6:46 ` Herve Codina
2025-09-16 10:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-16 12:22 ` Ayush Singh
2025-09-16 13:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-16 14:25 ` Herve Codina
2025-09-16 15:35 ` Ayush Singh
2025-09-18 3:16 ` David Gibson
2025-09-18 7:44 ` Herve Codina
2025-09-18 8:06 ` Herve Codina
2025-09-19 4:52 ` David Gibson
2025-09-19 5:17 ` Ayush Singh
2025-09-19 15:20 ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-09-23 8:09 ` David Gibson
2025-09-23 9:48 ` Herve Codina
2025-09-23 10:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-23 13:36 ` Herve Codina
2025-09-23 16:47 ` Andrew Davis
2025-09-24 4:17 ` David Gibson
2025-09-24 4:11 ` David Gibson
2025-09-24 17:03 ` Ayush Singh
2025-09-30 4:07 ` David Gibson
2025-09-30 7:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-10-10 7:58 ` David Gibson
2025-10-10 16:31 ` Herve Codina
2025-09-24 3:54 ` David Gibson
2025-09-24 12:31 ` Herve Codina
2025-09-29 9:23 ` David Gibson
2025-09-30 7:09 ` Herve Codina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250911155842.796c47fa@bootlin.com \
--to=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=ayush@beagleboard.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=devicetree-compiler@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jkridner@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).