From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1116416D4EF; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 14:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757687089; cv=none; b=cFMy9z36/BBAtjtXe51jrNJIQ4UReq8IIWldK+pzicsrma56xYq8X8yr91FCqQ4Z3hfErymZpOG7aZ5pRbIvLEjw4w/u6gI64PLG0lUmp7ELXuniQ5V2lWWicmVsXxCuk2dalt0ZZaUJyrk3vuMUJWcUh6FVaomfHxkfwMQWJM0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757687089; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HWeiQ8yLi5ihkUNO1KdlMYgVvMh3tn2UJYPfYos7vwM=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Y/tQHRr8X6I0h0kR1DHdkSq7jbOJs7oTB6g6/8U84+IJB3TmzyOt6Wev9s7E5afDMktFs1ITEZzVDPToJKgXyDwbK9XZNTIMPr167O/a6E1DUMfsil1sioAthERcLA3N05w/Mkw0dIBPWNuTRcTwDvQle3n8lTIIoqwVQtAw4ec= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4cNc7b37Qvz6M553; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 22:22:03 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E70CB14038F; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 22:24:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.15) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 16:24:44 +0200 Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 15:24:43 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: David Lechner CC: Petre Rodan , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Jonathan Cameron , Nuno S?? , Andy Shevchenko , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/14] iio: accel: bma220: reset registers during init stage Message-ID: <20250912152443.000011f3@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <719e510e-1032-47cf-9a75-82c36de732f4@baylibre.com> References: <20250910-bma220_improvements-v2-0-e23f4f2b9745@subdimension.ro> <20250910-bma220_improvements-v2-7-e23f4f2b9745@subdimension.ro> <719e510e-1032-47cf-9a75-82c36de732f4@baylibre.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 08:44:16 -0500 David Lechner wrote: > On 9/11/25 7:36 AM, Petre Rodan wrote: > > > > ... > > > Just for my curiosity, do reviewers apply the patches one by one to (a branch of) > > the tree itself or do they provide feedback directly based on the diffs? > > > > I think most reviewers are like me and only are looking at the diff in the > email. It would take too much time to apply every single patch I look at. So > I only do that in very rare cases when I have a special interest in a patch. Likewise. Jonathan