Re: Question on generic PCI ACPI/DT device property wrt ASPM

[Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>]

[+cc AceLan]

On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 09:48:06PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> There are drivers (in my case r8169) disabling ASPM for a device per default
> because there are known issues on a number of systems. However on other
> systems ASPM works flawlessly, and vendors (especially of notebooks) would
> like to (re-)enable ASPM for this device on such systems.

I would definitely love to be able to fully enable ASPM on these
devices everywhere and rip the ASPM code out of r8169.

> Reference:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250912072939.2553835-1-acelan.kao@canonical.com/
> 
> Realtek NICs are used on more or less every consumer device, and maintaining
> long DMI-based whitelists wouldn't be too nice.
> 
> Therefore idea is to use a device property (working title: aspm-is-safe), that
> can be set via ACPI or DT. In my case it's a PCIe NIC, but in general the
> property could be applicable on every PCIe device.
> So question is to which schema such a property would belong. Here?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-ep.yaml?h=next-20250916

I'm not super enthused about yet more knobs to control ASPM based on
issues we don't completely understand.

Quirks that say "X is broken on this device" are to be expected, but I
have a hard time understanding a quirk that says "this feature works
as it's supposed to."

If ASPM works on some systems but not others, it's either because some
Downstream Ports leading to the NIC have defects or Linux (or BIOS) is
configuring ASPM incorrectly sometimes.

I think we just need to figure this out.