From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1177B1A0711; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 15:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758208553; cv=none; b=p+X+LxNhuwor5PpyzbdmodvJnINIBY6d8byJztnCkdxVFMVQjBilS/gPOFg6khoIkpFU79CBn8JyG37H2Qk0lMtHS5U3dNAag6B2WgK/S34isoeDNpeNJ9TdJM0yhsrnVB5IfcGaQmBktYVXaMs42FZpKYsSZGHta8nft8DfETY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758208553; c=relaxed/simple; bh=r5o+CxqA/412fJ3eG2K654Tnc4D5Ezd5ce7Iv9F6Ko0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CrwKr9kAlP6D2VoG3dbQU9eniQp9+C1bV8sLKHazdBUrlV04nbcVJlik6nhw1wFwvqNJx2BYUHoYEcRtU7ljDtJTzD5aRK7+qT2QV1dftc8KELmznZAiHZ5teoOBNwvu7WdJWyPxFiCW5INgOjPFN4JaTXX/FOBpLSPooVP7PaU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OxuJHyBh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OxuJHyBh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0847CC4CEE7; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 15:15:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1758208552; bh=r5o+CxqA/412fJ3eG2K654Tnc4D5Ezd5ce7Iv9F6Ko0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OxuJHyBhTOSdSdOyE3sNTRJKEkqCOLu3lc+WuNawPNbB1YNa8AUdfN6c0xuRTbn+6 z9vDG5mY/1RuI2XwdFpGaaFqvLRldDZoQ63XANTSEkxK4FD2U/sccEEWcX4LA1FeP8 mH/jLnVeQvNE6Y4Iu2nsJS2CuijVsYQMUruRoZhXbAa5tXJ17D4E9qR2ZK4Uz9fdGn 4sFSJiwBR+i9Ux/fSHZrKhbfyd6eFfbc9LIwixhZnIxzpINPydzoTlCcaSjO6aMAxI Vf/Ldmyda6bwpe4ShtCAoKtmnE1R5KJ4K6rnN5iaWB0J81KP8zLm02bpbfa9ameAAW getsmNBOO3ANg== Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 16:15:47 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Robert Marko Cc: p.zabel@pengutronix.de, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com, daniel.machon@microchip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, lars.povlsen@microchip.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, luka.perkov@sartura.hr, benjamin.ryzman@canonical.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: reset: microchip: Add LAN969x support Message-ID: <20250918-truce-muster-d9a1818e7367@spud> References: <20250917111323.60781-1-robert.marko@sartura.hr> <20250917-paparazzi-hermit-3a4aa686add3@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k2146MXiFzmmP5e7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --k2146MXiFzmmP5e7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 01:45:32PM +0200, Robert Marko wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 7:38=E2=80=AFPM Conor Dooley w= rote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 01:12:35PM +0200, Robert Marko wrote: > > > LAN969x also uses the Microchip reset driver, so document its compati= ble. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Robert Marko > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.ya= ml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml > > > index f2da0693b05a..4d4dd47f830e 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml > > > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties: > > > enum: > > > - microchip,sparx5-switch-reset > > > - microchip,lan966x-switch-reset > > > + - microchip,lan969x-switch-reset > > > > Driver patch makes a fallback compatible seem usable. >=20 > Hi Conor, > Will respin to simply use the fallback compatible, that will avoid > adding more compatibles to the driver > for no reason. >=20 > But, can I ask what do you think about the > microchip,lan969x-switch-reset compatible? > Is lan969x fine or should I just make it lan9691 or like cause the > whole series uses the same > reset setup? I'd rather the 1, I thought that the x was part of the name for some reason. --k2146MXiFzmmP5e7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCaMwiIwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0g5zAQCnIRGhz+Srw14h0GSHIp6EAXNyzBx+jtrDNbBFA2EzOgEAyf4TNCUklcQO 3ZAB4lss+pXY/yNX2Taf7hhBxiEs2wY= =XzuA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k2146MXiFzmmP5e7--