From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Sebin Francis <sebin.francis@ti.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
"Marco Felsch" <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Brian Masney" <bmasney@redhat.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org" <arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] clk: scmi: Support Spread Spectrum for NXP i.MX95
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 14:13:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250924-dark-super-gharial-246400@sudeepholla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PAXPR04MB84590D5AAAB56ED7E1CBDE05881CA@PAXPR04MB8459.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 11:43:56AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] clk: scmi: Support Spread Spectrum for
> > NXP i.MX95
> ...
> > >>> SCMI_CLOCK_CFG_OEM_START = 0x80,
> > >>> + SCMI_CLOCK_CFG_IMX_SSC = 0x80,
> > >>
> > >> TI is also planning to implement the same in our upcoming platform.
> > >> so can we use a generic ID instead of vender specfic message ID?
> > >
> > > I tried to push to new generic ID [1] in half a year ago, but in the
> > > end ARM decided not to add generic ID for spread spectrum support.
> > >
> > > To i.MX, it is too late to use a generic ID and waiting spec, i.MX
> > > firmware has been public for quite some time and passed several
> > external releases.
> > > So I need to use what our firmware adds and spec allows: vendor
> > > extension.
> >
> > Thanks for the quick response,
> > Since this implementation is specific to i.MX, can you move this to a
> > vendor specific file, so that it will not break i.MX's firmware and TI can
> > implement SSC in TI specific file.
>
> i.MX has encountered issue with pinctrl-scmi.c and pinctrl-imx-scmi.c
> both supports SCMI PINCTRL. Current linux scmi does not support
> both drivers built in kernel image, because scmi devlink issue.
>
> Sudeep said he would address the devlink issue in 6.19 cycle.
>
Yes it is a different issue IMO and nothing related to this.
> Given the current situation, I'm hesitant to introduce a new driver
> saying clk-imx-scmi.c.
>
Yes please don't, and I don't see a strong reason for that(yet).
Unlike vendor protocol, there is no way we can no upfront how the vendors
can use this in their own colourful way. So I am not sure if we start
building something generic from the start or refactor as more vendors start
using it. Hard to decide 🙁. Lets see, need to think a bit.
If Peng or Sebin or others have some idea, please propose or start the
discussion so that we can evaluate the approach.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-24 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-15 8:29 [PATCH v4 0/5] clk: Support spread spectrum and use it in clk-scmi Peng Fan
2025-09-15 8:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: clock: Add spread spectrum definition Peng Fan
2025-09-22 16:02 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-09-15 8:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] clk: Introduce clk_hw_set_spread_spectrum Peng Fan
2025-09-21 20:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2025-09-22 2:05 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-15 8:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] clk: conf: Support assigned-clock-sscs Peng Fan
2025-10-06 10:44 ` Sebin Francis
2025-10-08 12:31 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-15 8:29 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] clk: Add KUnit tests for assigned-clock-sscs Peng Fan
2025-09-15 12:29 ` Brian Masney
2025-09-15 8:29 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] clk: scmi: Support Spread Spectrum for NXP i.MX95 Peng Fan
2025-09-23 10:52 ` Sebin Francis
2025-09-23 11:57 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-24 9:25 ` Sebin Francis
2025-09-24 11:43 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-24 12:15 ` Sebin Francis
2025-09-24 12:40 ` Cristian Marussi
2025-09-24 12:59 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-09-24 14:14 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-24 13:13 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2025-09-24 14:35 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-24 14:44 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] clk: Support spread spectrum and use it in clk-scmi Peng Fan
2025-09-24 15:33 ` Brian Masney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250924-dark-super-gharial-246400@sudeepholla \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=bmasney@redhat.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sebin.francis@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox