From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Randolph Lin <randolph@andestech.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
jingoohan1@gmail.com, mani@kernel.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
kwilczynski@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, alex@ghiti.fr,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, palmer@dabbelt.com,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, ben717@andestech.com,
inochiama@gmail.com, thippeswamy.havalige@amd.com,
namcao@linutronix.de, shradha.t@samsung.com,
randolph.sklin@gmail.com, tim609@andestech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] PCI: dwc: Skip failed outbound iATU and continue
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 16:10:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250926211023.GA2128495@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aNPq42O1Ml3ppF2M@swlinux02>
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 08:58:11PM +0800, Randolph Lin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 09:42:23AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 07:36:43PM +0800, Randolph Lin wrote:
> > > Previously, outbound iATU programming included range checks
> > > based on hardware limitations. If a configuration did not meet
> > > these constraints, the loop would stop immediately.
> > >
> > > This patch updates the behavior to enhance flexibility. Instead
> > > of stopping at the first issue, it now logs a warning with
> > > details of the affected window and proceeds to program the
> > > remaining iATU entries.
> > >
> > > This enables partial configuration to complete in cases where
> > > some iATU windows may not meet requirements, improving overall
> > > compatibility.
> >
> > It's not really clear why this is needed. I assume it's related
> > to dropping qilai_pcie_outbound_atu_addr_valid().
>
> Yes, I want to drop the previous atu_addr_valid function.
>
> > I guess dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu() must return an error for one
> > of the QiLai ranges? Which one, and what exactly is the problem?
> > I still suspect something wrong in the devicetree description.
>
> The main issue is not the returned error; just need to avoid
> terminating the process when the configuration exceeds the
> hardware’s expected limits.
>
> There are two methods to fix the issue on the Qilai SoC:
>
> 1. Simply skip the entries that do not match the designware hardware
> iATU limitations. An error will be returned, but it can be ignored.
> On the Qilai SoC, the iATU limitation is the 4GB boundary. Qilai SoC
> only need to configure iATU support to translate addresses below the
> "32-bits" address range. Although 64-bits addresses do not match the
> designware hardware iATU limitations, there is no need to configure
> 64-bits addresses, since the connection is hard-wired.
>
> 2. Set the devicetree only 2 viewport for iATU and force using
> devicetree value. This is a workaround in the devicetree, but the
> fix logic is not easy to document. Instead, we should enforce the
> use of the viewport defined in the devicetree and modify the
> designware generic code accordingly — using the viewport values from
> the devicetree instead of reading them from the designware
> registers. Since only two viewports are available for iATU, we
> should reserve one for the configuration registers and the other for
> 32-bit address access. Therefore, reverse logic still needs to be
> added to the designware generic code.
>
> Method 2 adds excessive complexity to the designware generic code.
> Instead, directly configuring the iATU and reporting an error when
> the configuration exceeds the hardware iATU limitations is a simpler
> and more effective approach to applying the fix.
I don't know the DesignWare iATU design very well, so I don't know if
this issue is something unique to Qilai or if it's something that
could be handled via devicetree.
Will look for input/acks from DesignWare maintainers (Jingoo, Mani).
> Conclusion:
> 1. The iATU needs to be configured for 32-bits address space.
> In compliance with hardware limitations.
> 2. The iATU needs to be configured for config space.
> In compliance with hardware limitations.
> 3. The iATU needs to be configured for 64-bit address space.
> This does not comply with hardware limitations and will print an error.
> As long as it does not return an error value that terminates subsequent
> operations, it is acceptable.
> Simply skipping this entry when configuring the iATU is acceptable.
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Randolph Lin <randolph@andestech.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 9 +++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > > index 952f8594b501..91ee6b903934 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > > @@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_iatu_setup(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> > > if (resource_type(entry->res) != IORESOURCE_MEM)
> > > continue;
> > >
> > > - if (pci->num_ob_windows <= ++i)
> > > + if (pci->num_ob_windows <= i)
> > > break;
> > >
> > > atu.index = i;
> > > @@ -773,9 +773,10 @@ static int dw_pcie_iatu_setup(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> > >
> > > ret = dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(pci, &atu);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > - dev_err(pci->dev, "Failed to set MEM range %pr\n",
> > > - entry->res);
> > > - return ret;
> > > + dev_warn(pci->dev, "Failed to set MEM range %pr\n",
> > > + entry->res);
> > > + } else {
> > > + i++;
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-riscv mailing list
> > > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>
> Sincerely,
> Randolph
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-26 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250923113647.895686-2-randolph@andestech.com>
2025-09-23 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] PCI: dwc: Skip failed outbound iATU and continue Bjorn Helgaas
2025-09-24 12:58 ` Randolph Lin
2025-09-26 21:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-09-29 14:03 ` Rob Herring
2025-09-30 12:05 ` Randolph Lin
2025-09-29 14:25 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250926211023.GA2128495@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ben717@andestech.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=inochiama@gmail.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=randolph.sklin@gmail.com \
--cc=randolph@andestech.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shradha.t@samsung.com \
--cc=thippeswamy.havalige@amd.com \
--cc=tim609@andestech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).