Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] another 'interrupts-extended' replacement needed?

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 07:21:16PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> I want to fix the following 'dtbs_check' issue:
> 
> arch/arm/boot/dts/renesas/sh73a0-kzm9g.dtb: accelerometer@1d (adi,adxl345): interrupts-extended: [[18, 2, 4], [18, 3, 4]] is too long
> 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml#
> 
> However, this series uncovers another place where 'interrupts-extended'
> is not recognized as an alternative to 'interrupts'. Namely, when this
> is part of a 'dependencies:' like in this binding:
> 
> arch/arm/boot/dts/renesas/sh73a0-kzm9g.dtb: accelerometer@1d (adi,adxl345): 'interrupts' is a dependency of 'interrupt-names'
> 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml#
> 
> Now, I wonder if this also needs to be fixed in dtschema? Or do we need
> another way to express the dependency?

In this case, the 'interrupt-names: [ interrupts ]' dependency should be 
dropped because that's *always* the dependency and the core handles it 
correctly:

dependencies:
  interrupt-names:
    oneOf:
      - required:
          - interrupts
      - required:
          - interrupts-extended

Rob