From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Sascha Bischoff" <sascha.bischoff@arm.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>, "Frank Li" <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] irqchip/gic-its: Rework platform MSI deviceID detection
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 11:58:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251014095845.1310624-5-lpieralisi@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251014095845.1310624-1-lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Current code retrieving platform devices MSI devID in the GIC ITS MSI
parent helpers suffers from some minor issues:
- It leaks a struct device_node reference
- It triggers an excessive WARN_ON on wrong of_phandle_args count detection
- It is duplicated between GICv3 and GICv5 for no good reason
- It does not use the OF phandle iterator code that simplifies
the msi-parent property parsing
Implement a helper function that addresses the full set of issues in one go
by consolidating GIC v3 and v5 code and converting the msi-parent parsing
loop to the more modern OF phandle iterator API, fixing the
struct device_node reference leak in the process.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Cc: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-its-msi-parent.c | 98 ++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-its-msi-parent.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-its-msi-parent.c
index eb1473f1448a..a65f762b7dd4 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-its-msi-parent.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-its-msi-parent.c
@@ -142,83 +142,51 @@ static int its_v5_pci_msi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
#define its_v5_pci_msi_prepare NULL
#endif /* !CONFIG_PCI_MSI */
-static int of_pmsi_get_dev_id(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
- u32 *dev_id)
+static int __of_pmsi_get_dev_id(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev, u32 *dev_id,
+ phys_addr_t *pa, bool is_v5)
{
- int ret, index = 0;
+ struct of_phandle_iterator it;
+ uint32_t args;
+ int ret;
/* Suck the DeviceID out of the msi-parent property */
- do {
- struct of_phandle_args args;
+ of_for_each_phandle(&it, ret, dev->of_node, "msi-parent", "#msi-cells", -1) {
+ /* GICv5 ITS domain matches the MSI controller node parent */
+ struct device_node *np __free(device_node) = is_v5 ? of_get_parent(it.node)
+ : of_node_get(it.node);
- ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node,
- "msi-parent", "#msi-cells",
- index, &args);
- if (args.np == irq_domain_get_of_node(domain)) {
- if (WARN_ON(args.args_count != 1))
- return -EINVAL;
- *dev_id = args.args[0];
- break;
+ if (np == irq_domain_get_of_node(domain)) {
+ if (of_phandle_iterator_args(&it, &args, 1) != 1) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "Bogus msi-parent property\n");
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (!ret && is_v5)
+ ret = its_translate_frame_address(it.node, pa);
+
+ if (!ret)
+ *dev_id = args;
+
+ of_node_put(it.node);
+ return ret;
}
- index++;
- } while (!ret);
-
- if (ret) {
- struct device_node *np = NULL;
-
- ret = of_map_id(dev->of_node, dev->id, "msi-map", "msi-map-mask", &np, dev_id);
- if (np)
- of_node_put(np);
}
- return ret;
+ struct device_node *msi_ctrl __free(device_node) = NULL;
+
+ return of_map_id(dev->of_node, dev->id, "msi-map", "msi-map-mask", &msi_ctrl, dev_id);
+}
+
+static int of_pmsi_get_dev_id(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
+ u32 *dev_id)
+{
+ return __of_pmsi_get_dev_id(domain, dev, dev_id, NULL, false);
}
static int of_v5_pmsi_get_msi_info(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
u32 *dev_id, phys_addr_t *pa)
{
- int ret, index = 0;
- /*
- * Retrieve the DeviceID and the ITS translate frame node pointer
- * out of the msi-parent property.
- */
- do {
- struct of_phandle_args args;
-
- ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node,
- "msi-parent", "#msi-cells",
- index, &args);
- if (ret)
- break;
- /*
- * The IRQ domain fwnode is the msi controller parent
- * in GICv5 (where the msi controller nodes are the
- * ITS translate frames).
- */
- if (args.np->parent == irq_domain_get_of_node(domain)) {
- if (WARN_ON(args.args_count != 1))
- return -EINVAL;
- *dev_id = args.args[0];
-
- ret = its_translate_frame_address(args.np, pa);
- if (ret)
- return -ENODEV;
- break;
- }
- index++;
- } while (!ret);
-
- if (ret) {
- struct device_node *np = NULL;
-
- ret = of_map_id(dev->of_node, dev->id, "msi-map", "msi-map-mask", &np, dev_id);
- if (np) {
- ret = its_translate_frame_address(np, pa);
- of_node_put(np);
- }
- }
-
- return ret;
+ return __of_pmsi_get_dev_id(domain, dev, dev_id, pa, true);
}
int __weak iort_pmsi_get_dev_id(struct device *dev, u32 *dev_id)
--
2.50.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-14 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 9:58 [PATCH v2 0/4] of/irq: Misc msi-parent handling fixes/clean-ups Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-10-14 9:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] of/irq: Add msi-parent check to of_msi_xlate() Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-10-14 22:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-15 7:38 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-10-14 9:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] of/irq: Fix OF node refcount in of_msi_get_domain() Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-10-14 22:20 ` Frank Li
2025-10-15 8:03 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-10-15 16:01 ` Frank Li
2025-10-14 9:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] PCI: iproc: Implement MSI controller node detection with of_msi_xlate() Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-10-15 7:40 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-10-14 9:58 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2025-10-14 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] irqchip/gic-its: Rework platform MSI deviceID detection Marc Zyngier
2025-10-15 7:46 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251014095845.1310624-5-lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--to=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sascha.bischoff@arm.com \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).