From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-m3275.qiye.163.com (mail-m3275.qiye.163.com [220.197.32.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 584113191B5; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 07:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.32.75 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760513428; cv=none; b=TSeWLsp8vk+wcOAQ7yGNhJCrIm1BMw79tISQqltINkDNUWllraTmSG8RNqUm5HcqHXeAZWfaef+3IJ3qKkXcnQvde/IBlfLLyL0SQA72IoWL/of9mrstTrLQJDQT96NAF+H6ZP+cKdwZ0brCUEOx1uvs+0Do9bTvDE6ri7PtUDk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760513428; c=relaxed/simple; bh=A4qtzS6/f/pecX6GOgrxPGmVThQldDEiFI2T/BUxuSo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=hnzBps1/k9BhZ4o2xH5SyvERd/egQXKolyeIqxfQzQ4lE5cXx6OCO5+8nJY18we0Bg/eAGBy2AxFmuVsMJnCuUATImBtEGJc7bj/YE5ncwK5CU0zeZ7klfxCfaaonNfjJtwEI84kb+zX2I2wEUnKBj5QlBk/XTg/mjD7sez4+hs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=thundersoft.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=thundersoft.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=thundersoft.com header.i=@thundersoft.com header.b=DiCuGLGh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.32.75 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=thundersoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=thundersoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=thundersoft.com header.i=@thundersoft.com header.b="DiCuGLGh" Received: from albert-OptiPlex-7080.. (unknown [117.184.129.134]) by smtp.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTP id 25f9bc543; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 15:30:15 +0800 (GMT+08:00) From: Albert Yang To: adrian.hunter@intel.com Cc: arnd@arndb.de, bst-upstream@bstai.top, catalin.marinas@arm.com, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, gordon.ge@bst.ai, krzk+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, soc@lists.linux.dev, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, will@kernel.org, yangzh0906@thundersoft.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] MAINTAINERS: add Black Sesame Technologies (BST) ARM SoC support Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 15:30:14 +0800 Message-ID: <20251015073014.1480709-1-yangzh0906@thundersoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <57743880-aecb-4300-8386-44d962659921@intel.com> References: <57743880-aecb-4300-8386-44d962659921@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-HM-Tid: 0a99e6c6d7c409cckunme94767a761da4f X-HM-MType: 1 X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUpXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZFg8aDwILHllBWSg2Ly tZV1koWUFITzdXWS1ZQUlXWQ8JGhUIEh9ZQVkZTktMVhpDQhgYHx5CGEkdTlYVFAkWGhdVEwETFh oSFyQUDg9ZV1kYEgtZQVlKSkxVSkNPVUpJQlVKSE9ZV1kWGg8SFR0UWUFZT0tIVUpLSUhCSEJVSk tLVUpCS0tZBg++ DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=DiCuGLGhn/KPK3GPbkC95HwnBSfdDQSl6wzN48jMYxr4NlDlx1h9TIsyGVqFQu2B6KU5LMb9zWxnuLHsbplmLMloHqzMwPEd43MCvj4YahW/3hpskaFGzLGtta3VEDTY6M1oiDNILtzKjdmVbj1stKUwOG5hChS++4BUT2mfbj0=; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=default; d=thundersoft.com; v=1; bh=O1qaZkX1700g4dn1D/gzvs0pnDtTldETwvN+nCYzCHU=; h=date:mime-version:subject:message-id:from; Hi Adrian, Thank you for the review and feedback! On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 04:29:25PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 23/09/2025 09:10, Albert Yang wrote: > > +ARM/BST SOC SUPPORT > > +M: Ge Gordon > > +R: BST Linux Kernel Upstream Group > > +L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) > > +S: Maintained > > Seems like it is "Supported" rather than "Maintained" ? > > S: *Status*, one of the following: > Supported: Someone is actually paid to look after this. > Maintained: Someone actually looks after it. > Odd Fixes: It has a maintainer but they don't have time to do > much other than throw the odd patch in. See below.. > Orphan: No current maintainer [but maybe you could take the > role as you write your new code]. > Obsolete: Old code. Something tagged obsolete generally means > it has been replaced by a better system and you > should be using that.> The status should likely be "Supported" rather than "Maintained" > based on the MAINTAINERS guidelines. You're absolutely right. "Supported" is more appropriate for this vendor-supported hardware. I will update the STATUS field to "Supported" in next of the patch series. Thanks for pointing this out. Best regards, Albert Yang