[PATCH v2 4/7] of/fdt: Fix incorrect use of dt_root_addr_cells in early_init_dt_check_kho()

[Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang@linux.dev>]

When reading the fdt_size value, the argument passed to dt_mem_next_cell()
is dt_root_addr_cells, but it should be dt_root_size_cells.

The same issue occurs when reading the scratch_size value.

Use a helper function to simplify the code and fix these issues.

Fixes: 274cdcb1c004 ("arm64: add KHO support")
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang@linux.dev>
---
 drivers/of/fdt.c | 14 ++------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
index d0caaab42aa7..4c45a97d6652 100644
--- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
+++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
@@ -918,26 +918,16 @@ static void __init early_init_dt_check_kho(void)
 {
 	unsigned long node = chosen_node_offset;
 	u64 fdt_start, fdt_size, scratch_start, scratch_size;
-	const __be32 *p;
-	int l;
 
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER) || (long)node < 0)
 		return;
 
-	p = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,kho-fdt", &l);
-	if (l != (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells) * sizeof(__be32))
+	if (!of_fdt_get_addr_size(node, "linux,kho-fdt", &fdt_start, &fdt_size))
 		return;
 
-	fdt_start = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &p);
-	fdt_size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &p);
-
-	p = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,kho-scratch", &l);
-	if (l != (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells) * sizeof(__be32))
+	if (!of_fdt_get_addr_size(node, "linux,kho-scratch", &scratch_start, &scratch_size))
 		return;
 
-	scratch_start = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &p);
-	scratch_size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &p);
-
 	kho_populate(fdt_start, fdt_size, scratch_start, scratch_size);
 }
 
-- 
2.51.0