From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-02.galae.net (smtpout-02.galae.net [185.246.84.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CBEF2F60A3; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 07:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.84.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763106091; cv=none; b=mkZigQZ0AFSbyLQUv63kQT30rp8+NZ2fomMVrqfeqWue9UCV/zsvC3Vjwu9gVpEJX9pg9PMKBtcyl4D1ZkdHf7frQKCT7STYSs3W4xbPQmPcUWfMdEzK1XeovcNIaSSaAmjRvcR75T6VPlwKCTxbZAnoOXrWcn5oPhj/nfCdHVU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763106091; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OiMeu0tamg27GyEN4OqG+CIznFFE/vebWRAa4Bsb4VI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bt4Q2SfwKEnoBhu/MKVHixOPOdLSalii7W0RuoVlHjZ/T28sWw/Zg83MUkKBdOgb0Djd/ijn2YXLdgH1xx9oQu2KRJS5NDGPkU6qU5pSEEb6DC01zQ8nQZLU5jmZFb/UsLuaCb02M/9vC3I0MJ9yhkcC8IMSSOKDMFkBrexXCuY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=BzOzY0cm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.84.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="BzOzY0cm" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-02.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D03E91A1A95; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 07:41:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3AF36060E; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 07:41:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 1818D102F28CB; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 08:41:22 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1763106086; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=CxtuouY15dmqdz/kBa2p3jgenEqmkhSb6ARS2BjXY+s=; b=BzOzY0cm5XVVH89LIadrgngMECdCBiRxbLBEJgcSAaZmZD4jIpm2NHjdxuVBrPEaEDMBEt 85x2yfQs77oDEr0uVNJ1KOBWPFwM/euNkH5svXR1EgZJxX6xTGo1rR3hBTnOIMOt7LrGC4 EY23c2JsZx79g7GI+1jZctghMUk9pGsirtwGum0kehtRsVCsHwGiZTnZJKCCwk9gg1X2vp 2DQv6g9Eb/Ch6auJFZnAZ1GmK9VGEG01QhO0Ru72gvSY16pVHNZd+txE8hsvWt5Bx7daT9 8oRAFs7yCwE++KQDQ0njMZU13yig2BsQ4qIwH8GIILqJNkORxx+6WlLW0MQQ5A== Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 08:41:22 +0100 From: Herve Codina To: Wolfram Sang , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Saravana Kannan , Serge Semin , Herve Codina Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Hoan Tran , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Phil Edworthy , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Pascal Eberhard , Miquel Raynal , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] gpio: renesas: Add support for GPIO and related interrupts in RZ/N1 SoC Message-ID: <20251114084122.01a0d281@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: <20251027123601.77216-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> References: <20251027123601.77216-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Hi Geert, On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 13:35:52 +0100 "Herve Codina (Schneider Electric)" wrote: > Hi, > > This series adds support for GPIO and GPIO IRQ mux available in the > RZ/N1 SoCs. > The series seems ready to be applied even with the minor feedback from Wolfram on patch 6. Do you expect a new iteration from my side or do you think this v6 iteration can be applied as it? Best regards. Hervé