From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD7A623B63C; Sun, 16 Nov 2025 16:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763309231; cv=none; b=pdsAWUMO23J8NmoKO1oihu0v0CGMMraowS/jLcRURcBnlYlAoL2fLdv5+ocOvaG8iIWQqZ4lACHx4CmOkkekxy6M7wm0HcDEoryts7ZULNdnt5mWQAvacAwhbkaSVHtu3gLZNu3t97+yvSBd8he9zHD5zbRk+id0UqzYLCt0/38= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763309231; c=relaxed/simple; bh=K878iBaE7XGaGTb7BzsrZT/a4sezd5ePLe4yGR05mB4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WuFGpJW0ySXoYwnX6XqEegAeVwBxEG8fTIKq9PohM21Nw+MBSFuEOJMht0XZuV3TJHYH5oOd3aNsbmn9jFP45fL1jKYco0AFpntzhiRWym33jLO9IfbHhcLZt0pbMf8V7+Bnwo7I38YOqEOMy3a0zhDWOl+sqyF8sbMQxhNfBjU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZlK0R4UJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZlK0R4UJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7D0FC116B1; Sun, 16 Nov 2025 16:07:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763309230; bh=K878iBaE7XGaGTb7BzsrZT/a4sezd5ePLe4yGR05mB4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZlK0R4UJfyKCja7bxyS531MemiftOHawEJGY+tk+SubZxqKSIODrDDt0ISBXbq8ug F6eP5aQ3jgxgpFg9GCGegG9+wc3eymwcLCDZvLF3MRQS1icUfu6pQQfPapGDd6wza3 dDWmqjwW6IgouuHXcHMWBREdEQz9Ha77vlKY6C7V4WQZd4hOGXXg9pLsyWKVEi76on qVTmFabTv8EId1L1+KqCK0GaVhFn36EgR/iVZ9c+s7EjoaIR/Q+TLXVO5PU5kZJnhO /a44Z2K6okEAmclDEuJ/AE6DBm+QlhtR3FXJOukMgYoimy5EsguQK62kFPPVUu7FDm 656cl3wMXPnLQ== Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 16:07:02 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: rodrigo.alencar@analog.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, David Lechner , Andy Shevchenko , Lars-Peter Clausen , Michael Hennerich , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: frequency: adf41513: driver implementation Message-ID: <20251116160702.1ac24a54@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20251110-adf41513-iio-driver-v1-0-2df8be0fdc6e@analog.com> <20251110-adf41513-iio-driver-v1-1-2df8be0fdc6e@analog.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.51; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:41:27 +0200 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 06:30:38PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 03:44:44PM +0000, Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay = wrote: =20 >=20 > ... >=20 > > In any case, I stopped my review here, you have more than enough to fix. > > Please, come next time with a tag from one whose name is in the MAINTAI= NERS. > > From now on it will be my requirement as a reviewer of IIO subsystem. = =20 >=20 > And to be more clear on this requirement (for all submissions from @analo= g.com > and related): A name from approximately below list I want to see as Rb. >=20 > Antoniu Miclaus > Marcelo Schmitt > Michael Hennerich > Nuno S=C3=A1 >=20 > (those people seems experienced and I have heard of / from). >=20 =46rom Nuno's mail seems that in general Analog actually have a better process for this than many (which is excellent to hear btw!) RB tags that come before being posted to the list only really have meaning if we know and have built up trust with the reviewers. This is different to ones on the list where we can see what the feedback was that has been acted on. I'll note that ADI sometimes works with external companies, so there are various other people who would work as well. Given that may change over time I'll not call them out explicitly but you can probably figure out who I mean. I have no idea if they also help with pre submission reviews though. Note that Andy's request here is specific to Analog given they have the folk to do it. I don't want this sort of requirement to apply to folk working for other companies who have a much smaller presence in IIO! (just for the record, as Andy was very clear this was a request specific to Analog). Jonathan p.s. Bad luck Rodrigo for being the submitter who triggered this! Looking forward to v2 - I'll probably not add more noise by reviewing this version.