From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A71C41D31B9; Mon, 17 Nov 2025 14:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763390188; cv=none; b=KxJVEs9Z8qBopqrcZztypLs4T8zRBkzqCXlHR+/lggK/gMO61AwNJOTxqNZe7y0xF6uaCFZHeIuKKQMT6Lz5bFvt0v2lgsZIBSQqADMPXgHbUK8NM/4zhBBpDgd2dHaXw7P4V9JBkagrvzmqR6Hgl6MAmS1p08ICVDofeO/9Pb4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763390188; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jpHTq2VyCK6MMaE3F5zeDQdp65AE4LebUx2/HG6St10=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VU11BLXxw6iJwWmyuXM0QQJfAerztrBsWbiHRJCTs2ELbPzkaRKxVj0xEQzqoCJcw3EW99iLoD2KGzBWyQk36eKsOScYgSdr3k7vjP9FBT9GdqEj4JaMR9/wmYsfsOTogWHDXfAEk/cXhN4hp2g5yYMwIEO80C2MOj+zo+85u7s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cJjCL/VI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cJjCL/VI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C79D4C2BC9E; Mon, 17 Nov 2025 14:36:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763390188; bh=jpHTq2VyCK6MMaE3F5zeDQdp65AE4LebUx2/HG6St10=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=cJjCL/VI3p/vrR/vPKvxut/drD5K9cmyQK/eoY+DNjQCqeG5MpMd0cwEAM2AsxBoq 0LV5PiUCf5VdmmokrAfZF6EGsXEqDpR1WTxjc/0fMOkDmmv9gBCI7Vj1uJyYFGW1A1 x0P+6npHsrBcuf+Pq5PshLcygzwYWJA1bgCaoKa5pZ77cbNqgKpl2wUA9fTZYT1S1P 4ExSbuO9PlNp9THY3kR6Sc81NF9RmgKdR+QJi8SieOlKraNRaONlMPwto+XwG0Tb8O 0qS2z/l1Ft9m8VKK9l1E+iqIKBBkD9EnSHcXBhPweQU9508Yui3dbjevURCMRTX6rC vRY+Rn8LtQ90Q== Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 14:36:23 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Yu-Chun Lin Cc: afaerber@suse.de, conor+dt@kernel.org, cy.huang@realtek.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, james.tai@realtek.com, krzk+dt@kernel.org, lee@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org, robh@kernel.org, stanley_chang@realtek.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: realtek: Add Kent Soc family compatibles Message-ID: <20251117-platonic-settle-8c4f4b64aeb8@spud> References: <20251113-preorder-task-4e5ba09580d8@spud> <20251117105542.14789-1-eleanor.lin@realtek.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WGyk7a5/LFEGj+tF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251117105542.14789-1-eleanor.lin@realtek.com> --WGyk7a5/LFEGj+tF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 06:55:42PM +0800, Yu-Chun Lin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 08:30:07PM +0800, Yu-Chun Lin wrote: > > > Define compatible strings for Realtek RTD1501s, RTD1861b and RTD1920s. > > >=20 > > > Additionally, convert legacy DTS-style comments to YAML description= =20 > > > properties, following the pattern from the ARM bindings conversion=20 > > > series [1]. > > > > "Additionally" is often a sign that it should be in a different patch. > > Acked-by: Conor Dooley > > pw-bot: not-applicable >=20 > Hi Conor, >=20 > I'm planning to split the changes into two separate patches: >=20 > 1. One patch to convert realtek.yaml to match the DTS-style comments, > following the pattern from the ARM bindings conversion series. > 2. Another patch to define the compatible strings for Realtek RTD1501s, > RTD1861b, and RTD1920s. >=20 > Could you confirm if both patches should include your Acked-by tag, or is > it only applicable to one of them? I acked it to go together, because I didn't think it was worth a resubmission for that alone. You can keep the ack I think, I'll take a look regardless. --WGyk7a5/LFEGj+tF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCaRsy5wAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0nUKAP9tTYo/6WSr9wWOGgqtt4RhqY3eqn9PXtJSwkDJpcToHAD/dJCPZT1NB/EO N9IliGRj0I7irxugG7qs1qXuIBKcfAQ= =a7ys -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WGyk7a5/LFEGj+tF--