Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] of/fdt: Some bug fixes and cleanups

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 09:47:45PM +0800, Yuntao Wang wrote:
> This patch series fixes several bugs related to dt_root_addr_cells and
> dt_root_size_cells, and performs some cleanup.
> 
> Changelog:
> 
> v2 -> v3:
>   - Use of_flat_dt_ instead of of_fdt_ as the prefix for the newly added
>     helper functions
> 
>   - Improve the internal logic of of_flat_dt_get_addr_size_prop() and
>     of_flat_dt_get_addr_size()
> 
>   - Introduce the entry_index parameter for of_flat_dt_read_addr_size()
> 
>   - Fix some warnings and coding-style issues
> 
> v1 -> v2:
>   - Consolidate duplicate code into helper functions
> 
> Links to previous patch series:
> 
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20251113155104.226617-1-yuntao.wang@linux.dev/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20251112143520.233870-1-yuntao.wang@linux.dev/
> 
> Yuntao Wang (8):
>   of/fdt: Consolidate duplicate code into helper functions
>   of/fdt: Fix the len check in early_init_dt_check_for_elfcorehdr()
>   of/fdt: Fix the len check in
>     early_init_dt_check_for_usable_mem_range()
>   of/fdt: Fix incorrect use of dt_root_addr_cells in
>     early_init_dt_check_kho()
>   of/fdt: Simplify the logic of early_init_dt_scan_memory()
>   of/reserved_mem: Simplify the logic of __reserved_mem_reserve_reg()
>   of/reserved_mem: Simplify the logic of
>     fdt_scan_reserved_mem_reg_nodes()
>   of/reserved_mem: Simplify the logic of __reserved_mem_alloc_size()

I've applied the series. I was going to send the first 4 for 6.18, 
but since we're pretty close to the merge window, I decided to 
keep it all together for 6.19.

Thanks for all the clean-ups.

Rob