From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Cc: "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Marcelo Schmitt" <marcelo.schmitt@analog.com>,
"Michael Hennerich" <michael.hennerich@analog.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Sean Anderson" <sean.anderson@linux.dev>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/9] spi: support controllers with multiple data lanes
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2025 17:18:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251227171850.0c93c1c9@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251219-spi-add-multi-bus-support-v4-3-145dc5204cd8@baylibre.com>
On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 15:32:11 -0600
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> Add support for SPI controllers with multiple physical SPI data lanes.
> (A data lane in this context means lines connected to a serializer, so a
> controller with two data lanes would have two serializers in a single
> controller).
>
> This is common in the type of controller that can be used with parallel
> flash memories, but can be used for general purpose SPI as well.
>
> To indicate support, a controller just needs to set ctlr->num_data_lanes
> to something greater than 1. Peripherals indicate which lane they are
> connected to via device tree (ACPI support can be added if needed).
>
> The spi-{tx,rx}-bus-width DT properties can now be arrays. The length of
> the array indicates the number of data lanes, and each element indicates
> the bus width of that lane. For now, we restrict all lanes to have the
> same bus width to keep things simple. Support for an optional controller
> lane mapping property is also implemented.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> ---
>
> v4 changes:
> - Update for changes in devicetree bindings.
> - Don't put new fields in the middle of CS fields.
> - Dropped acks since this was a significant rework.
>
> v3 changes:
> * Renamed "buses" to "lanes" to reflect devicetree property name change.
>
> This patch has been seen in a different series [1] by Sean before:
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/20250616220054.3968946-4-sean.anderson@linux.dev/
>
> Changes:
> * Use u8 array instead of bitfield so that the order of the mapping is
> preserved. (Now looks very much like chip select mapping.)
> * Added doc strings for added fields.
> * Tweaked the comments.
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/spi/spi.h | 22 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> index e25df9990f82..9caa22583b8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> @@ -2370,7 +2370,52 @@ static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_device *spi,
> spi->mode |= SPI_CS_HIGH;
>
> /* Device DUAL/QUAD mode */
> - if (!of_property_read_u32(nc, "spi-tx-bus-width", &value)) {
> +
> + rc = of_property_read_u32_array(nc, "spi-tx-lane-map", spi->tx_lane_map,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(spi->tx_lane_map));
Why must there always be a fixed number of these? Isn't it meant to be
one per lane in use? Or at least to me that seems reasonable assumption?
Maybe use of_property_read_variable_u32_array() which takes min and max sizes
and returns (on success) how many were there.
> + if (rc == -EINVAL) {
> + /* Default lane map */
> + for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(spi->tx_lane_map); idx++)
> + spi->tx_lane_map[idx] = idx;
Having this fixed in size is fine even if we only use first few elements.
> + } else if (rc < 0) {
> + dev_err(&ctlr->dev,
> + "failed to read spi-tx-lane-map property: %d\n", rc);
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + rc = of_property_count_u32_elems(nc, "spi-tx-bus-width");
> + if (rc < 0 && rc != -EINVAL) {
> + dev_err(&ctlr->dev,
...
> @@ -2394,7 +2439,61 @@ static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_device *spi,
> }
> }
>
> - if (!of_property_read_u32(nc, "spi-rx-bus-width", &value)) {
> + for (idx = 0; idx < spi->num_tx_lanes; idx++) {
> + if (spi->tx_lane_map[idx] >= spi->controller->num_data_lanes) {
> + dev_err(&ctlr->dev,
> + "spi-tx-lane-map has invalid value %d (num_data_lanes=%d)\n",
> + spi->tx_lane_map[idx],
> + spi->controller->num_data_lanes);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + rc = of_property_read_u32_array(nc, "spi-rx-lane-map", spi->rx_lane_map,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(spi->rx_lane_map));
Similar to above. Not obvious to me why this is fixed size read.
> + if (rc == -EINVAL) {
> + /* Default lane map */
> + for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(spi->rx_lane_map); idx++)
> + spi->rx_lane_map[idx] = idx;
...
> diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> index cb2c2df31089..7aff60ab257e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
...
> +/* Max no. of data lanes supported per spi device */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-27 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-19 21:32 [PATCH v4 0/9] spi: add multi-lane support David Lechner
2025-12-19 21:32 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] spi: dt-bindings: change spi-{rx,tx}-bus-width to arrays David Lechner
2026-01-06 16:36 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-01-08 12:26 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2026-01-11 11:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-19 21:32 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-{tx,rx}-lane-map properties David Lechner
2025-12-19 22:40 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-01-07 15:57 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-01-08 12:29 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2026-01-08 14:40 ` Rob Herring
2025-12-19 21:32 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] spi: support controllers with multiple data lanes David Lechner
2025-12-27 15:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-12 17:01 ` David Lechner
2025-12-27 17:18 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-12-19 21:32 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] spi: add multi_lane_mode field to struct spi_transfer David Lechner
2025-12-27 15:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-12 17:10 ` David Lechner
2025-12-19 21:32 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] spi: Documentation: add page on multi-lane support David Lechner
2026-01-08 12:40 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2026-01-08 15:57 ` David Lechner
2026-01-08 12:44 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2026-01-08 15:56 ` David Lechner
2026-01-08 16:43 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2026-01-08 17:22 ` David Lechner
2025-12-19 21:32 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] spi: dt-bindings: adi,axi-spi-engine: add " David Lechner
2026-01-06 16:36 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-12-19 21:32 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] spi: axi-spi-engine: support SPI_MULTI_LANE_MODE_STRIPE David Lechner
2026-01-08 12:45 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2025-12-19 21:32 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ad7380: add spi-rx-bus-width property David Lechner
2026-01-06 16:37 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-12-19 21:32 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] iio: adc: ad7380: add support for multiple SPI lanes David Lechner
2026-01-08 12:46 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2026-01-11 11:57 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] spi: add multi-lane support Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251227171850.0c93c1c9@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.schmitt@analog.com \
--cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox