From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Stuebner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3399: rock960: Rename vcc_sys into vcc5v0_sys Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:38:36 +0100 Message-ID: <2025500.4so6M6JK9C@phil> References: <20190311150332.19492-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190311150332.19492-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Jagan Teki Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring , Akash Gajjar , linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Am Montag, 11. M=E4rz 2019, 16:03:30 CET schrieb Jagan Teki: > It is always better practice to follow regulator naming conventions > as per the schematics for future references. > = > So, rename vcc_sys into vcc5v0_sys as per rk3399 power diagram of > rock960 schematics. > = > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki > Signed-off-by: Akash Gajjar I've double-checked both rock960 and ficus schematics to verify and applied both patch 1+2 for 5.2 Thanks Heiko