public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saikiran <bjsaikiran@gmail.com>
To: broonie@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com
Cc: andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add off-on-delay support
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:32:09 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260127190211.14312-1-bjsaikiran@gmail.com> (raw)

This series adds support for the standard `regulator-off-on-delay-us`
property to the Qualcomm RPMh regulator driver and updates the
corresponding Device Tree bindings.

Motivation:
On the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x (Snapdragon X Elite), the camera regulators
(LDO1, LDO3, LDO7) have large bulk capacitors and rely on passive discharge.
When these regulators are disabled, the voltage decays very slowly. If
re-enabled too quickly, the sensor experiences a brownout and fails to
initialize.

Verification:
I verified that the core `drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c` does not
currently parse `regulator-off-on-delay-us` in `of_get_regulation_constraints()`.
Therefore, the driver must parse this property explicitly and populate
`rdesc->off_on_delay` so the regulator core can enforce the constraint.

Changes in v3:
- Added Patch 1/2: Update DT bindings to allow `regulator-off-on-delay-us`
  for `qcom,rpmh-regulator` (Requested by Mark Brown).
- Updated Patch 2/2: Refined commit message to explicitly mention the
  passive discharge and bulk capacitor mechanism on the Yoga Slim 7x
  (Requested by Mark Brown).

Changes in v2:
- Moved the motivation/context from the cover letter into the commit
  message of the driver patch.

Saikiran (2):
  dt-bindings: regulator: qcom,rpmh: Allow regulator-off-on-delay-us
  regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add support for regulator-off-on-delay-us

             reply	other threads:[~2026-01-27 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-27 19:02 Saikiran [this message]
2026-01-27 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: regulator: qcom,rpmh: Allow regulator-off-on-delay-us Saikiran
2026-01-29 17:49   ` Rob Herring
2026-01-29 18:15     ` Mark Brown
2026-01-30 11:05       ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-03 16:20         ` Kamal Wadhwa
2026-02-03 16:30           ` Mark Brown
2026-02-06 16:19             ` Kamal Wadhwa
2026-02-08 13:07               ` Saikiran B
2026-02-12  8:51                 ` Kamal Wadhwa
2026-01-27 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add support for regulator-off-on-delay-us Saikiran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260127190211.14312-1-bjsaikiran@gmail.com \
    --to=bjsaikiran@gmail.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox