Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] iio: light: vcnl4000: add support for Capella CM36686 and CM36672P

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>]

On Sun, 15 Feb 2026 22:06:28 +0200
Erikas Bitovtas <xerikasxx@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2/15/26 9:31 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Feb 2026 19:28:56 +0200
> > Erikas Bitovtas <xerikasxx@gmail.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 2/14/26 8:09 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:  
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  drivers/iio/light/vcnl4000.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4000.c b/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4000.c
> >>>> index a36c23813679..1f8f4e4586f4 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4000.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4000.c
> >>>> @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ static const int vcnl4040_ps_oversampling_ratio[] = {1, 2, 4, 8};
> >>>>  #define VCNL4000_SLEEP_DELAY_MS	2000 /* before we enter pm_runtime_suspend */
> >>>>  
> >>>>  enum vcnl4000_device_ids {
> >>>> +	CM36672P,
> >>>>  	VCNL4000,
> >>>>  	VCNL4010,
> >>>>  	VCNL4040,
> >>>> @@ -235,6 +236,8 @@ struct vcnl4000_chip_spec {
> >>>>  };
> >>>>  
> >>>>  static const struct i2c_device_id vcnl4000_id[] = {
> >>>> +	{ "cm36672p", CM36672P },
> >>>> +	{ "cm36686", VCNL4040 },
> >>>>  	{ "vcnl4000", VCNL4000 },
> >>>>  	{ "vcnl4010", VCNL4010 },
> >>>>  	{ "vcnl4020", VCNL4010 },
> >>>> @@ -1842,6 +1845,22 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec vcnl4040_channels[] = {
> >>>>  	}
> >>>>  };    
> >>>
> >>> ...
> >>>     
> >>>>  	[VCNL4000] = {
> >>>>  		.prod = "VCNL4000",
> >>>>  		.init = vcnl4000_init,
> >>>> @@ -2033,6 +2065,14 @@ static int vcnl4000_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> >>>>  }
> >>>>  
> >>>>  static const struct of_device_id vcnl_4000_of_match[] = {
> >>>> +	{
> >>>> +		.compatible = "capella,cm36672p",
> >>>> +		.data = (void *)CM36672P,
> >>>> +	},
> >>>> +	{
> >>>> +		.compatible = "capella,cm36686",
> >>>> +		.data = (void *)VCNL4040,    
> >>>
> >>> Is this necessary? I 'think' if you drop it we'll match instead
> >>> on the vcnl4040 fallback and then the access to the data will be
> >>> through the stripped name only bit of the compatible (first entry, not
> >>> the fallback so cm36686 in this case). So you do need the cm36686
> >>> entry in the i2c_device_id table above. Probably better to keep
> >>> this here to avoid having to reason this out - but perhaps a
> >>> comment to that affect would be useful (assuming you verify my
> >>> reasoning).
> >>>    
> >> After I removed the entry for "capella,cm36686", I received the "Unable
> >> to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference" error in dmesg. And at least
> >> stk3310 driver includes a compatible entry both for the device (stk3013)
> >> and for the fallback (stk3310). So my assumption is that this entry is
> >> needed.
> >> I could include a comment explaining that cm36686 is fully compatible
> >> with vcnl4040, however, if that is necessary.  
> > 
> > Thanks for checking.
> > 
> > What did you get as the backtrace?  I'm hoping it'll explain what I'm
> > misunderstanding!  The hacks around using the wrong table for compatible
> > matches have tripped me up before.
> > 
> > Jonathan
> >   
> 
> I am attaching a link to the dmesg. There were quite a lot of lines in
> the stack trace and I am not sure what is the right way to post logs in
> the mailing list.
> 
> https://pastebin.com/QgeTdNEP

Thanks. only relevant bit is probably:

[   15.566076]  vcnl4000_probe+0x54/0x288 [vcnl4000] (P)
[   15.566102]  i2c_device_probe+0x2b0/0x358
[   15.566121]  really_probe+0x154/0x448

My guess is my understanding of i2c_client_get_device_id() is wrong and that
is returning NULL.  That can only happen if client->name is not a match for
anything the i2_device_id table.  If you have a chance, can you dump
what client->name is in this case? I thought it ended up as
cm36686 (stripped first entry in compatible) but seems I'm probably wrong on
that :(

The path I thought worked was via info->type (which gets copied to client->name)
set via of_alias_from_compatible() here.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.19-rc4/source/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c#L30
Which should just return the first compatible without that vendor prefix.

Meh, this doesn't really matter anyway as once we refactor to actually use
the data in the of_device_id table, we will need the entry and in the meantime
it's sort of documentation.

J

>