From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.hugovil.com (mail.hugovil.com [162.243.120.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D87274D991F; Tue, 3 Mar 2026 16:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=162.243.120.170 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772554994; cv=none; b=lw026KHirLiLAidKKN7/BobnFMIpn5hHabZuqUqyuRPzFXadFdFbZT4c9MjfJfZkKOM+0u6+vt4kyMownL8WzyN89O65Oj4HDoHTSX5UWqFTL0Kuo0IMksXCxgnrGYjlQWusHiyeD7/u34JuRPCixRicFH6lrUN9en/LSnJqF58= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772554994; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DLu3q9o3XmmE0oW7F+z6Mc4THjhnJnjhOxFhA8FxFEU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Subject; b=ao0jKiIF/PbpeXBz4yBikckX8BEmh0biRYEYPpnsE9wBLvLjJfKJXnSljyuAgRGKnv074WjAWPw702iWe6llhv19tte1bIaZRKjgdN8RWtpYnZDSjF/qmGMThvwg7AorUO6hPkKhcz/XMipb9pbBj5Q+jfwmdKrDfpwBmPDHPiQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hugovil.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hugovil.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hugovil.com header.i=@hugovil.com header.b=pg6KN0dJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=162.243.120.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hugovil.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hugovil.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hugovil.com header.i=@hugovil.com header.b="pg6KN0dJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hugovil.com ; s=x; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Message-Id:Cc:To:From :Date:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dIABMziNLvW0jGN8kMlgpZrAq89Imgr046x+DRl4Rp0=; b=pg6KN0dJ5ZW2AM6cCDdSSbnuh8 PhW6AkE7BgkA004hNmbRR18mGBAQhSx99q5o9AAXWurQ7v8cqZw4Sy816/wAn7HandtGwvps2gs9f Rqcam9kTr/6hJ0oAXcGwT8kAE04C11Py+CCOXtzokRwkAzZE0Z/Vid+3hcaJR9LmbvjM=; Received: from modemcable168.174-80-70.mc.videotron.ca ([70.80.174.168]:35704 helo=pettiford.lan) by mail.hugovil.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1vxSWF-0003Ms-A8; Tue, 03 Mar 2026 11:22:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 11:22:46 -0500 From: Hugo Villeneuve To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, andrzej.hajda@intel.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, rfoss@kernel.org, Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, jonas@kwiboo.se, jernej.skrabec@gmail.com, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org, tzimmermann@suse.de, Frank.Li@nxp.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com, antonin.godard@bootlin.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Hugo Villeneuve Message-Id: <20260303112246.0bd6238aba7489b6de499299@hugovil.com> In-Reply-To: <920740e1-5bbb-4632-a62d-325715cd8043@kernel.org> References: <20260302190953.669325-1-hugo@hugovil.com> <20260302190953.669325-5-hugo@hugovil.com> <20260303-rational-thundering-firefly-9dcaa9@quoll> <20260303095533.1c6dff174f6c9d162d3e3303@hugovil.com> <920740e1-5bbb-4632-a62d-325715cd8043@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 70.80.174.168 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: hugo@hugovil.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.8 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: change incorrect VAR-SOM-6UL model name X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.hugovil.com) Hi Krzysztof, On Tue, 3 Mar 2026 16:19:54 +0100 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 03/03/2026 15:55, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > On Tue, 3 Mar 2026 08:10:51 +0100 > > Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 02:03:40PM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > >>> From: Hugo Villeneuve > >>> > >>> There is no Variscite module named VAR-SOM-MX6UL. > >> > >> VAR-SOM-MX6? And there is. > >> https://dev.variscite.com/var-som-mx6/ > > > > Ok, > > I was confused by the "const: variscite,var-som-imx6ul" and thought the > > description was not matching. > > > > But there is still no module named "VAR-SOM-MX6UL", but "VAR-SOM-MX6", > > with different CPU variants like UL, ULL, etc. So I will modify the > > patch to reflect that. > > I don't understand what you want to reflect/modify. > > Description says: VAR-SOM-MX6 > My link says: VAR-SOM-MX6 > > What is incorrect? VAR-SOM-MX6 is ok, like your link shows, but not VAR-SOM-MX6UL. If someone looks at VAR-SOM-MX6UL, they may think that the "MX6" part refers to the VAR-SOM-MX6, or they may think that the "6UL" part refers to the VAR-SOM-6UL, and it can be extremely confusing. This was my understanding at first, and the reason why I submitted this patch. If you look at the associated board entry in the binding, it says "const: variscite,mx6ulconcerto" but the VAR-SOM-MX6 doesn't use the concerto board. It uses a board named "VAR-MX6CustomBoard": https://variscite.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/VAR-MX6CustomBoard-Datasheet.pdf The VAR-SOM-6UL uses the concerto board: https://variscite.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Concerto-Board_Datasheet.pdf So the description in the binding "i.MX6UL Variscite VAR-SOM-MX6 Boards" is wrong, and needs to be replaced with VAR-SOM-6UL. By the way, support for the VAR-SOM-MX6 is provided by this binding entry: - description: i.MX6Q Variscite VAR-SOM-MX6 Boards items: - const: variscite,mx6customboard - const: variscite,var-som-imx6q - const: fsl,imx6q > > > > In fact, I will modify the description to reflect that it supports both > > VAR-SOM-MX6 and VAR-SOM-6UL modules. > > Are you sure that it does? With my new research, as explained above, this is not the case. I will modify the description to reflect that it supports VAR-SOM-6UL modules only. -- Hugo Villeneuve