From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E69F2DC332; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 13:07:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773148050; cv=none; b=QZU1iWwJpjeCqiozkvTkE05hnSXXXGyNZBW1LrnyV0mE49CyVGymljl22yUKLhMzQpB8PpcRtsfqXVoeymb8tho8M3TZdNzZkEBSUg+fiImtyLQthZW/LfllVuM1UYtbN6MCR4MS7egxKjkmfjmGXpj/97rLE/9OdVzp/bouD9U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773148050; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4+SaNib3pUJYCNJtfv1dZilBc3fNPAJeQ2G0ugxTdBg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Met2Y39WzNExB9JfxAcrBolHAxxQRw6xknJVcfOFttQ4Y+MdW+OPwHKDQhHiX2EkbiaUepaWD2h0mO+teAjmwju2HLF6FqJH2yUF092HMiuJ2TyAnbPRpEG0+ohbCZrAbJdJC7zoUWr5qudsw7Jviq5V/ZameVbu4MhZ7ASO4s8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=c+FZv+gC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="c+FZv+gC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08F4DC19425; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 13:07:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773148049; bh=4+SaNib3pUJYCNJtfv1dZilBc3fNPAJeQ2G0ugxTdBg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=c+FZv+gCD13AGNkW3GRgoA7FEcMmiy/BUvJeuVCN6OpKCzLAQtOq1Q2RNuDokRGpX TlAgH8y4b5HTYywpoQbR7RDnuAOGnHbLAY+tTVU8h96nTWVikH2z1UVQQAg/TGEbYe fTn1wwynm1nlFlq4VCAONqpS6xpTF2XYyxqeezPTeRAvpNrm2XRj+GC0Rpoxe6sEK3 vnZ8hw6iALMOjBd2mE6dH2ggEi8GFTS6oYuyjS451VAedkzZZEEdn9iRtulwJ1Ko6f F1fsyZV8Tj8zx3UY4VWW83WYA1fy7OdjVh5fgd5dHZSDzmUoCm4IXKxXXTC6btczY6 JB8kJxNHEXC2A== Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 13:07:25 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Matti Vaittinen Cc: Matti Vaittinen , Matti Vaittinen , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: bd72720: Add ROHM BD73900 Message-ID: <20260310130725.GL183676@google.com> References: <6eaa9f08848c27c462e156e31ae5bdfd33bf2fe7.1771938507.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com> <00f4efa9-bdc2-4f10-a3a1-88bd16ac38ad@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <00f4efa9-bdc2-4f10-a3a1-88bd16ac38ad@gmail.com> On Tue, 10 Mar 2026, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > On 24/02/2026 15:11, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > From: Matti Vaittinen > > > > The ROHM BD79300 is almost identical to the BD72720. Main differences > > are the initial values for some of the registers. Thus, it appears the > > BD79300 can be handled with same software as BD72720. > > > > Adding the compatible for the BD79300 enables people to use the real IC > > type in the device-tree instead of claiming it is BD72720. This does > > also help differentiating the ICs if appears it is needed. > > > > Add own compatible for the BD73900 and mark BD72720 as a fall-back. > > > > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen > Hi dee Ho peeps, > > I wonder if this should go via MFD tree? It was missed because of a malformed subject line. If fixed this up and apply the patch. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]