From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C36583AE6F7; Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:53:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773910421; cv=none; b=Gt1gtN5sxsTuZzActtRuqCIoP6NvlP0vGNqiLzIE/ivwjqozoBjr1l4TIXTKWvmddatt8Ft2VZq7kmFRHh7LsiVINvtd3xCbXCzEH3cIpi4HVqKMKFhsjclDsMotoB52vVUE82+yhPhVjjRqykqf90fteveK7LXSjc2phYvc6vo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773910421; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xYHImYfHrAusksE/SpjZQ+in7j8UXG5KBq/tmynCpQw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=D0+U0/iIjvi5Igiu8hCLwFnpHTCFmRc9FbIYC3Bz3TS79NUMrv5vgFCiYluz8PCtwwg74P1/3/pMlRzlVKDn4g4k+vwuBdY0L/BBn7BE156OlPwj6a+u7Boe0MMQVLSe8IUPRRFlVbhSGjEAxqLY9xFV4ziDtkI8FSfeLPH5WGY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=sPHwLOEx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="sPHwLOEx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2140C2BCB0; Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:53:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773910421; bh=xYHImYfHrAusksE/SpjZQ+in7j8UXG5KBq/tmynCpQw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=sPHwLOExhZnduMELsY52wbb1vCMSrz4QNIozsTSmgQoxf1YJv82jpqqxBHV+iXtmO S3Y/2pIDsKQi3st3Qtx6bCACq2TR1j/W+859DUktnqELWILNrrURCGxNxiATp0XlVd 9ML5f2wyRAAQstl95uienRCa3YM9ElbTHPMy2Gbe8K58iIei6LvjbfuRCcFexJarOF Xf87C/YfM3HDeECWLvDXGsSbgOC3R9jSmWPezsfq1LpESFqGOABnd+MLIA7ynJEk1f UtFaSJtUrIhdh7SrwzSuoJt/Soe5l1n4njpiV4U1bLkx4HnUS/flpTSNOxtdgRg/uY MV1OwC//1fbtQ== Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 09:53:38 +0100 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Alexey Charkov Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heikki Krogerus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Gene Chen , Yuanshen Cao , Sebastian Reichel , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: usb: richtek,rt1711h: Switch ETEK ET7304 to use a fallback compatible Message-ID: <20260319-hopping-translucent-dugong-dfd4e7@quoll> References: <20260318-husb311-v4-0-69e029255430@flipper.net> <20260318-husb311-v4-2-69e029255430@flipper.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260318-husb311-v4-2-69e029255430@flipper.net> On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 06:32:54PM +0400, Alexey Charkov wrote: > As stated in [1], ETEK ET7304 is identical to Richtek RT1715, except for > the VID value in its registers, so reflect it in the bindings via a > fallback compatible. > > As there are various TCPCI chips by different vendors reimplementing the > registers and behavior of the RT1711H/RT1715, fallback compatibles will > scale better. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260220-et7304-v3-2-ede2d9634957@gmail.com/ [1] > Signed-off-by: Alexey Charkov > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/richtek,rt1711h.yaml | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Best regards, Krzysztof