[PATCH v2 0/2] Add Qualcomm SA8650P SoC to socinfo

[PATCH v2 0/2] Add Qualcomm SA8650P SoC to socinfo

[Radu Rendec]

Add SoC ID for SA8650P to socinfo.

Note: Posting patches originally by Lei wang <quic_leiwan@quicinc.com>.
Minor edits to commit messages for better clarity and to match previous
submissions that add a SoC to socinfo.

---
Changes in v2:
- Fix incorrect spelling of Lei's identity (no code change)

---
Lei wang (2):
  dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: Add SoC ID for SA8650P
  soc: qcom: socinfo: Add SoC ID for SA8650P

 drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c         | 1 +
 include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

-- 
2.53.0

[PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: Add SoC ID for SA8650P

[Radu Rendec]

From: Lei wang <quic_leiwan@quicinc.com>

Add unique ID for Qualcomm SA8650P SoC.

Signed-off-by: Lei wang <quic_leiwan@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Radu Rendec <rrendec@redhat.com>
---
 include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
index 8776844e0eeb3..85282029d80cf 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
@@ -260,6 +260,7 @@
 #define QCOM_ID_SM8475			530
 #define QCOM_ID_SM8475P			531
 #define QCOM_ID_SA8255P			532
+#define QCOM_ID_SA8650P			533
 #define QCOM_ID_SA8775P			534
 #define QCOM_ID_QRU1000			539
 #define QCOM_ID_SM8475_2		540
-- 
2.53.0

[PATCH v2 2/2] soc: qcom: socinfo: Add SoC ID for SA8650P

[Radu Rendec]

From: Lei wang <quic_leiwan@quicinc.com>

Add SoC ID table entry for Qualcomm SA8650P.

Signed-off-by: Lei wang <quic_leiwan@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Radu Rendec <rrendec@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c
index 003a2304d535c..01eae575afd27 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c
@@ -488,6 +488,7 @@ static const struct soc_id soc_id[] = {
 	{ qcom_board_id(SM8475) },
 	{ qcom_board_id(SM8475P) },
 	{ qcom_board_id(SA8255P) },
+	{ qcom_board_id(SA8650P) },
 	{ qcom_board_id(SA8775P) },
 	{ qcom_board_id(QRU1000) },
 	{ qcom_board_id(SM8475_2) },
-- 
2.53.0

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: Add SoC ID for SA8650P

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/03/2026 16:23, Radu Rendec wrote:
> From: Lei wang <quic_leiwan@quicinc.com>
> 
> Add unique ID for Qualcomm SA8650P SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lei wang <quic_leiwan@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Radu Rendec <rrendec@redhat.com>
> ---


Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] soc: qcom: socinfo: Add SoC ID for SA8650P

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/03/2026 16:23, Radu Rendec wrote:
> From: Lei wang <quic_leiwan@quicinc.com>
> 
> Add SoC ID table entry for Qualcomm SA8650P.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lei wang <quic_leiwan@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Radu Rendec <rrendec@redhat.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>

Here tag is missing as well.

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: Add SoC ID for SA8650P

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/03/2026 20:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/03/2026 16:23, Radu Rendec wrote:
>> From: Lei wang <quic_leiwan@quicinc.com>
>>
>> Add unique ID for Qualcomm SA8650P SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lei wang <quic_leiwan@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Radu Rendec <rrendec@redhat.com>
>> ---
> 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> 
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> 

And I read now answer to v1, so the DCO and patch provenance still needs
clarifications.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: Add SoC ID for SA8650P

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/03/2026 20:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/03/2026 20:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/03/2026 16:23, Radu Rendec wrote:
>>> From: Lei wang <quic_leiwan@quicinc.com>
>>>
>>> Add unique ID for Qualcomm SA8650P SoC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lei wang <quic_leiwan@quicinc.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Radu Rendec <rrendec@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>
>> <form letter>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
> 
> And I read now answer to v1, so the DCO and patch provenance still needs
> clarifications.

It's fine, SoB now matches original patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof