From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A293318BA8; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 15:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774107678; cv=none; b=jGe1C0M78rAWhlTHknENaYWGQMcF4sBlV3FDD8qd1IrwIR/3XNxW6NoWVwlofiMN0OAwRv/RPnd3vDqzE6bk7cov6IIbrgAjSe1g6WB2kl1I4ytoUkZAsKHFyGAzI+h8wCsIn0JoMImtn2ieEkMhbP2n5Yxc6L2yIvaN/w/1p7g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774107678; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZW7lnFfrC21mPclbeUUTcSK17EwEfNIv6CxVgFstctQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RZ/PFtER/opsv0QsKLYQUL4Zd/p3qAdodIBC/CKqVbmqBEE3xDmpYq9c74sEKWT2iyc0/zOOXH/9vC3QsUYas1RGrDNVumu1FU6y+2stM0SpqU9VVuTBD4UIVpt8IxwT9AosLv/l2b/iNDTVC6lt8AE1BVOWES6cA3eCYejiqk0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UOM1+CcS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UOM1+CcS" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D686C19421; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 15:41:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774107678; bh=ZW7lnFfrC21mPclbeUUTcSK17EwEfNIv6CxVgFstctQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UOM1+CcS7Nvw/ekzHHhYX5CVpN7ij/r8WAYEC2y+O+9f4ao8GNO43xfZdjwfGWzYM Ox2321i9SZsG+9/dnDzhOlbMHJ0C2BavlqXiHFS7iFwNGQMx0KhQmPgnSEbU6OFhKP 0thTlWRoIgqZGzIl+ztel2pC/4N46YgbnWy21bLGcMM8qzBcaYDDPAbWuxcnX1Z0PB mcnDJI2KBH7t+Fo81GAeGdJta7lYIxBgOxToDso0K+ZTbtTNIpoRP5HT50UlrWbsho JInztTmHWzb07ZfITyAmY1bpfP1JOjedujIr4eG2OR8F3h1+CDsOXB4kWIs2Nkljko lSuNW8UOGX5sA== Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 15:41:09 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: David =?UTF-8?B?TWFyaW5vdmnEhw==?= Cc: andriy.shevchenko@intel.com, dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, michael.hennerich@analog.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] iio: dac: ltc2632: add support for LTC2654 DAC family Message-ID: <20260321154109.79266899@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: <20260320150957.105571-1-david.marinovic@pupin.rs> References: <20260318135736.91564-1-david.marinovic@pupin.rs> <20260320150957.105571-1-david.marinovic@pupin.rs> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.51; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 20 Mar 2026 16:09:45 +0100 David Marinovi=C4=87 wrote: > From: David Marinovic >=20 > Greetings! >=20 > This is v3 of the LTC2654 DAC support patch series. >=20 > The LTC2654 is a quad-channel, 16-/12-bit DAC with internal > reference voltage and SPI interface, sharing the same 24-bit > SPI protocol as the LTC2632/2634/2636 family. >=20 > The LTC2654L-16 variant was tested on a Phytec phyCORE-STM32MP1 > board with the DAC connected via SPI1. The driver probes successfully > and all 4 channels are accessible via IIO sysfs. >=20 > Changes in v3: > - Patch 1 unchanged > - DT bindings use fallback compatibles for LTC2654-L12 and > LTC2654-H12, which are register-compatible with LTC2634-L12 > and LTC2634-H12 > - LTC2654-L16 and LTC2654-H16 keep separate compatible strings > as no existing compatible supports 16-bit resolution > - 12-bit variants reuse existing LTC2634 chip_info structures, > so only two new chip_info structures are added for 16-bit variants >=20 Applied to the testing branch of iio.git (which will become togreg once the bots let me know if they found any problems). I made a few minor tweaks as called out in specific patches. Thanks, Jonathan >=20 > David Marinovic (3): > iio: dac: ltc2632: drop enum and use individual chip_info objects > dt-bindings: iio: dac: ltc2632: add LTC2654 compatible strings > iio: dac: ltc2632: add support for LTC2654 DAC family >=20 > .../bindings/iio/dac/lltc,ltc2632.yaml | 12 +- > drivers/iio/dac/ltc2632.c | 367 +++++++++--------- > 2 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 191 deletions(-) >=20