From: Avinash Bhatt <avinash.bhatt@intel.com>
To: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
johannes@sipsolutions.net, johannes.berg@intel.com,
miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com, kobi.guetta@intel.com,
emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com,
Avinash Bhatt <avinash.bhatt@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/1] dt-bindings: net: wireless: intel,iwlwifi: add binding
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 08:57:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260408055709.11579-1-avinash.bhatt@intel.com> (raw)
Hi DT maintainers and community,
We are the Intel wireless LAN driver team (iwlwifi). This is our first
attempt at a Device Tree binding and we are posting this RFC well ahead
of any formal submission to get early guidance and feedback.
Background:
Intel discrete Wi-Fi adapters are traditionally configured by platform
firmware via ACPI DSM methods. As ARM64 and other non-x86 platforms
gain adoption, we want to support platforms that use Device Tree instead
of ACPI for providing this OEM configuration data (SAR power limits,
regulatory overrides, 6 GHz country enablement, etc.).
Scope of this RFC:
This binding currently covers only the Wi-Fi 7 BE200 adapter (PCI ID
8086:272b). Support for other Intel discrete Wi-Fi devices may be added
in future revisions as we validate the binding on additional platforms.
Similarly, the set of properties documented here reflects what we have
implemented today -- some properties may be revised, renamed, or
extended based on feedback before the final submission.
What we are looking for:
- Feedback on the overall approach and whether the property
naming/structure follows DT conventions
- Any concerns about the layout of multi-cell properties (revision +
bitmap pattern used throughout)
- Guidance on anything that would prevent this from being accepted
upstream
The patch passes `make dt_binding_check` cleanly.
As this is our first DT binding submission, any feedback on conventions
or best practices we may have missed is very welcome.
Thanks in advance for your time,
Avinash Bhatt
Intel Wireless LAN Team
Avinash Bhatt (1):
dt-bindings: net: wireless: intel,iwlwifi: add binding
.../bindings/net/wireless/intel,iwlwifi.yaml | 413 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 413 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/intel,iwlwifi.yaml
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-08 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-08 5:57 Avinash Bhatt [this message]
2026-04-08 5:57 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: net: wireless: intel,iwlwifi: add binding Avinash Bhatt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260408055709.11579-1-avinash.bhatt@intel.com \
--to=avinash.bhatt@intel.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kobi.guetta@intel.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox