From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A777740DFC9; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 08:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776240618; cv=none; b=gFiHPTIktxq6nWK28NSlQj+9rWpK/YeDxSeqYwWkw8dNPul4Kt045hAYve0pEEYdi7erfNDbWppj4NaXYYVO1fSsxooRlJN5ker1ptVenGuG6AYHNhDCj6sknAjWd+J8VlLFsoDiVUBVyPU6v26NcoKtElFeMSL9FffzZ4YU7+A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776240618; c=relaxed/simple; bh=I6eUDp4wTRJP5CSONuLda4AnlkaTkRvF/XhtVGrCOXs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Pqm/ImGWkYQRvzkj1LV6BT/Bl/HiK6FscHe43ZJ6a8mLV7R/ERH0WULp4nbTfGPdWWlWNxuEXxAn/4C+yBRjjoEUDU0IWFvZEcfogGPboEUtjEgcs/Dr2IK8dw1VzmcS3nm7Xxqt1wo0EKAJ+bcy8tfErSa+MbGTg8TznYQ3kpg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=f3DLZyu8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="f3DLZyu8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D051FC19424; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 08:10:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1776240618; bh=I6eUDp4wTRJP5CSONuLda4AnlkaTkRvF/XhtVGrCOXs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=f3DLZyu8wclWP9+9yOvpttjvy+zqfD0qAV5MaRuHF9J1O8UwpI4uWV8qnSug3lX2w kPQIXfMqwh36ZO2coLxi2u6jRokNlRwhoEwAxIQ15NumsflWfytZ3O539wqYHLzMQA apBR8Lwl79DV7n4k8/SBFS0ue3GMZb37+qDKGA01GPmaAFRWVRzs3uQc3btQXZxhA3 ThI3/I4JeR0GjzCPzyqH4sux85UmwK5LBii9LgahjwUtlHT6VDEM7htJ6/cx+I/+OC 4TME98PO+5p1Gb9I01x3Ml1A3UkufM50/TCZv9NuvJKtz8NpIOJhPpoDOEVtOPp1ex lz01AVaghKcuQ== Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 10:10:16 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Guoniu Zhou Cc: Michael Riesch , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , Laurent Pinchart , Frank Li , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] media: dt-bindings: add NXP i.MX95 compatible string Message-ID: <20260415-glaring-premium-nuthatch-ce00fc@quoll> References: <20260415-csi2_imx95-v1-0-7d63f3508719@oss.nxp.com> <20260415-csi2_imx95-v1-4-7d63f3508719@oss.nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260415-csi2_imx95-v1-4-7d63f3508719@oss.nxp.com> On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 11:46:55AM +0800, Guoniu Zhou wrote: > The i.MX95 CSI-2 controller is nearly identical to i.MX93, with the > only difference being the use of IDI (Image Data Interface) instead > of IPI (Image Pixel Interface). The binding constraints are otherwise > the same. Nearly identical with some difference really, really suggests they are compatible. Express compatibility or explain why they are not compatible (difference between IDI and IPI unfortunately does not help me). Best regards, Krzysztof