From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7C06382389; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776694486; cv=none; b=MTFkJ7cp/V/iEjOKijhyVyv1xG5m3ltjWA7mS6BXjO//BwQ4fniczO569O0uKpxLIgXyC5JXrgs0Nyzs6ipHUO5sBGGCknfM6Or1fX5Q6g5qmM3quHgbPB6Q2UW2OK/rrFCGW5c6YJOH7AStYZLb45xtYxLomiuNQ/Sko86XO+w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776694486; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8Nte2YJgSiUtFuCrOky4JdK1trVLbH28GAm5o55yJ94=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=t1rvYpPB12RxewBXr+99kjj1EA4G2hPUUXq/Zx+E4e50z1msCw3JrJv9W63cbmFN9IyA9SvcthenGs4Dka191TKCDJ0MDbSzsoISkTvVoyz9MPWxvXejcV08SKtLmfpM9oaMzWAYy1vVZJRfyhH5tzy1XtJVkX9yArXyeY9xdSo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=S1vu6RRT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="S1vu6RRT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E49EC19425; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:14:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1776694485; bh=8Nte2YJgSiUtFuCrOky4JdK1trVLbH28GAm5o55yJ94=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=S1vu6RRTG20NQc+5Gyq7ep+AY0jsV8TJUTDVGo+/yO7b6ijYF0Ig3+UTS1PSzVp0M /fGqmQsMyr3SMRfSNuQv2eoEx7HoKO4xNgBktOXYcW+3EePKivvfZIMuKyfPq4U9t/ /a0xs8j9g7N8eAylMUX7wcclnKUCxFv0RGoI+KZ+QT+2RdvaPEUGzLhN2IgPcMMjhs d1HqkVXboY/IAkfdz54Hqo9ER3KNvJV1shhbeu2POIdDUlAp9n7BSGXXJyddguGor5 Bectzvqotl+z0evyFTyadsLVqJafChyGZ7dOYZslbrS3azpJjWsMTLSqZj9VklEmtH BwcDACUsQRgYA== Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 16:14:43 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Fenglin Wu Cc: Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Konrad Dybcio , Dmitry Baryshkov , Subbaraman Narayanamurthy , David Collins , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel@oss.qualcomm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: spmi: glymur-spmi-pmic-arb: Add compatible for Qualcomm Hawi SoC Message-ID: <20260420-inescapable-fantastic-coua-5dba14@quoll> References: <20260419-hawi-spmi-v3-0-b04ee909cb87@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260419-hawi-spmi-v3-1-b04ee909cb87@oss.qualcomm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260419-hawi-spmi-v3-1-b04ee909cb87@oss.qualcomm.com> On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 07:25:52PM -0700, Fenglin Wu wrote: > The PMIC arbiter in the Qualcomm Hawi SoC is version v8.5, which > introduces parity and CRC checks for data received from the PMIC, > as well as NACK checks for command sequences except for read. > All other features in PMIC arbiter remain the same as the one in > the Qualcomm Glymur SoC, with the only differences being some > additional error status checks. > > Therefore, add a string for "qcom,hawi-spmi-pmic-arb" as a compatible > entry for "qcom,glymur-spmi-pmic-arb". > > Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/qcom,glymur-spmi-pmic-arb.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Best regards, Krzysztof