From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@kernel.org>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/bridge: imx8qxp-pxl2dpi: avoid of_node_put() on ERR_PTR()
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:25:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260421-godlike-rigorous-lori-23e2df@quoll> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260420024559.114664-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 10:45:59AM +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> imx8qxp_pxl2dpi_get_available_ep_from_port() may return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV)
> or ERR_PTR(-EINVAL). imx8qxp_pxl2dpi_find_next_bridge() stores that
That's bug there.
> value in a __free(device_node) variable and then immediately checks
> IS_ERR(ep).
>
> On the error path, returning from the function triggers the cleanup
> handler for __free(device_node). Since the device_node cleanup helper
> only checks for NULL before calling of_node_put(), this results in
> of_node_put(ERR_PTR(...)), which may lead to an invalid kobject_put()
> dereference and crash the kernel.
>
> Fix it by avoiding __free(device_node) for the endpoint pointer and
> releasing it explicitly after obtaining the remote port parent.
>
> This issue was found by a custom static analysis tool.
>
> Fixes: ceea3f7806a10 ("drm/bridge: imx8qxp-pxl2dpi: simplify put of device_node pointers")
Nope. This is not a fix for buggy driver. Fix buggy driver.
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Fix DEFINE_FREE(device_node, ...) directly
>
> include/linux/of.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index 2b95777f16f6..600a6e8418bb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_node_get(struct device_node *node)
> }
> static inline void of_node_put(struct device_node *node) { }
> #endif /* !CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC */
> -DEFINE_FREE(device_node, struct device_node *, if (_T) of_node_put(_T))
> +DEFINE_FREE(device_node, struct device_node *, if (_T && !IS_ERR(_T)) of_node_put(_T))
So you open coded IS_ERR_OR_NULL. No, wrong pattern. Fix buggy pattern
in the driver.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-21 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-20 2:45 [PATCH v2] drm/bridge: imx8qxp-pxl2dpi: avoid of_node_put() on ERR_PTR() Guangshuo Li
2026-04-21 8:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260421-godlike-rigorous-lori-23e2df@quoll \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox