From: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@amd.com>
To: <andersson@kernel.org>, <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
<robh@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <michal.simek@amd.com>, <tanmay.shah@amd.com>, <ben.levinsky@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] remoteproc: add AMD BRAM-based remote processor driver
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 09:27:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260427162703.1644103-1-ben.levinsky@amd.com> (raw)
Add a BRAM-based remoteproc driver and corresponding binding
for AMD soft processors located in programmable logic.
v2:
This version pivots the series away from a MicroBlaze-specific
binding and driver shape and instead models a BRAM-based soft-core
processor subsystem more generally.
This follows the upstream feedback that amd,microblaze was too tied
to the processor architecture while also being too generic as a DT
compatible for the hardware interface being described.
Patch 1, dt-bindings: remoteproc: document AMD BRAM-based rproc
- Renamed the binding away from amd,microblaze and reframed it
around a BRAM-based soft-core processor subsystem.
- Dropped the redundant trailing "binding" wording from the patch
subject.
- Rewrote the binding text to describe the hardware rather than the
Linux remoteproc framework.
- Reworked the example to address the original dt_binding_check
complaints about the root node and simple-pm-bus example shape.
- Added a clocks property for the soft-core subsystem.
Patch 2, remoteproc: add AMD BRAM-based remote processor driver
- Renamed the driver away from the MicroBlaze-specific name to match
the BRAM-based binding.
- Added clock handling for the soft-core subsystem and the matching
COMMON_CLK dependency in Kconfig.
- Cleaned up the reset comments and removed the success dev_dbg()
message called out in review.
Ben Levinsky (2):
dt-bindings: remoteproc: document AMD BRAM-based rproc
remoteproc: add AMD BRAM-based remote processor driver
.../bindings/remoteproc/amd,bram-rproc.yaml | 98 +++++++
MAINTAINERS | 7 +
drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 14 +
drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/remoteproc/amd_bram_rproc.c | 243 ++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 363 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/amd,bram-rproc.yaml
create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/amd_bram_rproc.c
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-27 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 16:27 Ben Levinsky [this message]
2026-04-27 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: document AMD BRAM-based rproc Ben Levinsky
2026-04-27 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] remoteproc: add AMD BRAM-based remote processor driver Ben Levinsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260427162703.1644103-1-ben.levinsky@amd.com \
--to=ben.levinsky@amd.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=tanmay.shah@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox