From: Robby Cai <robby.cai@nxp.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
s.hauer@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, shawnguo@kernel.org,
martin.kepplinger@puri.sm, kernel@pengutronix.de,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: imx8mq: Correct MIPI CSI clocks
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 15:58:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260430075820.GA3539725@shlinux88> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aeIX-YbSwhmuJwst@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 07:22:33AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 07:01:59PM +0800, Robby Cai wrote:
> > CSI capture may intermittently fail due to mismatched clock rates. The
> > previous configuration violated the timing requirement stated in the
> > i.MX8MQ Reference Manual:
> >
> > "The frequency of clk must be exactly equal to or greater than the RX
> > byte clock coming from the RX DPHY."
> >
> > Update the clock configuration to ensure that the CSI core clock rate is
> > equal to or greater than the incoming DPHY byte clock.
>
> You reduce clock, how to make sure it >= ?
This is a mistake in the commit message. IMX8MQ_CLK_CSIX_PHY_REF refers to the
UI clock (clk_ui), not the RX DPHY byte clock. There is no direct >= relationship
with the CSI core clock other than the documented bandwidth requirement.
>
> > The updated clock
> > ratios are consistent with those used in NXP's downstream BSP.
>
> "downstream BSP" is not solidate reference for clock rate, it'd better
> refer to date sheet, dose datasheet require such frequecy
>
> Frank
I will revisit the clock assumptions in the next revision.
Regards,
Robby
> >
> > Fixes: bcadd5f66c2a ("arm64: dts: imx8mq: add mipi csi phy and csi bridge descriptions")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Robby Cai <robby.cai@nxp.com>
> > ---
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-17 11:01 [PATCH 0/2] Enable dual OV5640 cameras on i.MX8MQ EVK board Robby Cai
2026-04-17 11:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: imx8mq: Correct MIPI CSI clocks Robby Cai
2026-04-17 11:22 ` Frank Li
2026-04-30 7:58 ` Robby Cai [this message]
2026-04-18 1:12 ` Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
2026-04-30 7:34 ` Robby Cai
2026-04-17 11:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mq-evk: Enable MIPI CSI and dual OV5640 cameras Robby Cai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260430075820.GA3539725@shlinux88 \
--to=robby.cai@nxp.com \
--cc=Frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.kepplinger@puri.sm \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox