From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Jan Carlo Roleda <jancarlo.roleda@analog.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] leds: ltc3208: Add driver for LTC3208 Multidisplay LED Driver
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:05:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260430150508.GK1806155@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260416-upstream-ltc3208-v4-2-3884ed3e49f5@analog.com>
On Thu, 16 Apr 2026, Jan Carlo Roleda wrote:
> Kernel driver implementation for LTC3208 Multidisplay LED Driver.
>
> The LTC3208 is a Multi-display LED driver, designed to control up to
> 7 distinct LED channels (MAIN, SUB, AUX, CAMHI, CAMLO, RED, GREEN, BLUE),
> each configurable with its own current level that is equally set to its
> respective output current source pins for external LEDs.
>
> It is programmed via the I2C serial interface.
> MAIN and SUB support 8-bit current level resolution,
> while AUX, CAMHI/LO, RED, GREEN, and BLUE support 4-bit levels.
>
> The AUX LED channel can be configured to mirror the CAM, SUB, and MAIN
> channel current levels, or as its own independent AUX channel.
>
> The CAM LED channel is configured as 2 separate CAMHI and CAMLO register
> sub-channels, which currnet is selected via the CAMHL pin, or set to
> CAMHI register only via setting the S_CAMHILO bit high in register G (0x7).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Carlo Roleda <jancarlo.roleda@analog.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> drivers/leds/Kconfig | 12 ++
> drivers/leds/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/leds/leds-ltc3208.c | 278 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 292 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 19b0b84e934d..48bae02057d5 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -15131,7 +15131,7 @@ M: Jan Carlo Roleda <jancarlo.roleda@analog.com>
> L: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
> S: Maintained
> W: https://ez.analog.com/linux-software-drivers
> -F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/adi,ltc3208.yaml
Is this related to this change? Was it intentional?
> +F: drivers/leds/leds-ltc3208.c
>
> LTC4282 HARDWARE MONITOR DRIVER
> M: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> index 597d7a79c988..d13bbec73f06 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> @@ -1029,6 +1029,18 @@ config LEDS_ACER_A500
> This option enables support for the Power Button LED of
> Acer Iconia Tab A500.
>
> +config LEDS_LTC3208
> + tristate "LED Driver for Analog Devices LTC3208"
> + depends on LEDS_CLASS && I2C
> + select REGMAP_I2C
> + help
> + Say Y to enable the LTC3208 LED driver.
> + This enables the LED device LTC3208, a 7-channel, 17-current source
> + multidisplay high-current LED driver, configured via I2C.
> +
> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
> + be called ltc3208.
> +
> source "drivers/leds/blink/Kconfig"
>
> comment "Flash and Torch LED drivers"
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/Makefile b/drivers/leds/Makefile
> index 8fdb45d5b439..b08b539112b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/leds/Makefile
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_LP8788) += leds-lp8788.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_LP8860) += leds-lp8860.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_LP8864) += leds-lp8864.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_LT3593) += leds-lt3593.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_LTC3208) += leds-ltc3208.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_MAX5970) += leds-max5970.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_MAX77650) += leds-max77650.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_MAX77705) += leds-max77705.o
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-ltc3208.c b/drivers/leds/leds-ltc3208.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9da8f4b359e3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-ltc3208.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,278 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * LED driver for Analog Devices LTC3208 Multi-Display Driver
> + *
> + * Copyright 2026 Analog Devices Inc.
> + *
> + * Author: Jan Carlo Roleda <jancarlo.roleda@analog.com>
> + */
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/leds.h>
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#define LTC3208_LED_SET_HIGH_BYTE_DATA GENMASK(7, 4)
> +#define LTC3208_LED_SET_LOW_BYTE_DATA GENMASK(3, 0)
> +
> +/* Registers */
> +#define LTC3208_REG_A_GRNRED 0x1 /* Green (High half-byte) */
> + /* and Red (Low half-byte) current DAC*/
> +#define LTC3208_REG_B_AUXBLU 0x2 /* AUX (High half-byte) */
> + /* and Blue (Low half-byte) current DAC*/
> +#define LTC3208_REG_C_MAIN 0x3 /* Main current DAC */
> +#define LTC3208_REG_D_SUB 0x4 /* Sub current DAC */
> +#define LTC3208_REG_E_AUX_SELECT 0x5 /* AUX DAC Select */
> +#define LTC3208_AUX1_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
> +#define LTC3208_AUX2_MASK GENMASK(3, 2)
> +#define LTC3208_AUX3_MASK GENMASK(5, 4)
> +#define LTC3208_AUX4_MASK GENMASK(7, 6)
> +#define LTC3208_REG_F_CAM 0x6 /* CAM (High half-byte and Low half-byte) current DAC*/
> +#define LTC3208_REG_G_OPT 0x7 /* Device Options */
> +#define LTC3208_OPT_CPO_MASK GENMASK(7, 6)
> +#define LTC3208_OPT_DIS_RGBDROP BIT(3)
> +#define LTC3208_OPT_DIS_CAMHILO BIT(2)
> +#define LTC3208_OPT_EN_RGBS BIT(1)
> +
> +#define LTC3208_MAX_BRIGHTNESS_4BIT 0xF
> +#define LTC3208_MAX_BRIGHTNESS_8BIT 0xFF
> +
> +#define LTC3208_NUM_LED_GRPS 8
> +#define LTC3208_NUM_AUX_LEDS 4
> +
> +#define LTC3208_NUM_AUX_OPT 4
> +#define LTC3208_MAX_CPO_OPT 3
> +
> +enum ltc3208_aux_channel {
> + LTC3208_AUX_CHAN_AUX = 0,
> + LTC3208_AUX_CHAN_MAIN,
> + LTC3208_AUX_CHAN_SUB,
> + LTC3208_AUX_CHAN_CAM
> +};
> +
> +enum ltc3208_channel {
> + LTC3208_CHAN_MAIN = 0,
> + LTC3208_CHAN_SUB,
> + LTC3208_CHAN_AUX,
> + LTC3208_CHAN_CAML,
> + LTC3208_CHAN_CAMH,
> + LTC3208_CHAN_RED,
> + LTC3208_CHAN_BLUE,
> + LTC3208_CHAN_GREEN
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const ltc3208_dt_aux_channels[] = {
> + "adi,aux1-channel", "adi,aux2-channel",
> + "adi,aux3-channel", "adi,aux4-channel"
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const ltc3208_aux_opt[] = {
> + "aux", "main", "sub", "cam"
> +};
> +
> +struct ltc3208_led {
> + struct led_classdev cdev;
> + struct i2c_client *client;
> + enum ltc3208_channel channel;
> +};
> +
> +struct ltc3208_dev {
> + struct i2c_client *client;
We don't need 2 of these.
> + struct regmap *map;
'regmap' throughout.
> + struct ltc3208_led *leds;
__counted_by?
> +};
> +
> +static const struct regmap_config ltc3208_regmap_cfg = {
> + .reg_bits = 8,
> + .val_bits = 8,
> +};
'.cache_type'?
> +
> +static int ltc3208_led_set_current_low(struct regmap *regmap, u8 reg, u8 level)
> +{
> + return regmap_update_bits(regmap, reg, LTC3208_LED_SET_LOW_BYTE_DATA, level);
> +}
> +
> +static int ltc3208_led_set_current_high(struct regmap *regmap, u8 reg, u8 level)
> +{
> + return regmap_update_bits(regmap, reg, LTC3208_LED_SET_HIGH_BYTE_DATA, level);
> +}
No abstraction for the sake of it. Use regmap_update_bits() in place instead.
It looks like 'level' is not shifted here, which means 'level & mask' inside
'regmap_update_bits' will evaluate to 0. Could we use 'regmap_field' for these
bit-level accesses instead, as it handles the shifting automatically?
> +
> +static int ltc3208_led_set_brightness(struct led_classdev *led_cdev, enum led_brightness brightness)
> +{
> + struct ltc3208_led *led = container_of(led_cdev, struct ltc3208_led, cdev);
> + struct i2c_client *client = led->client;
> + struct ltc3208_dev *dev = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
This confused me for a moment.
Drop the '_dev" part and call the variable 'ddata'.
> + struct regmap *regmap = dev->map;
'regmap' throughout.
> + u8 current_level = brightness;
> +
> + switch (led->channel) {
> + case LTC3208_CHAN_MAIN:
> + return regmap_write(regmap, LTC3208_REG_C_MAIN, current_level);
> + case LTC3208_CHAN_SUB:
> + return regmap_write(regmap, LTC3208_REG_D_SUB, current_level);
> + case LTC3208_CHAN_AUX:
> + return ltc3208_led_set_current_high(regmap, LTC3208_REG_B_AUXBLU, current_level);
> + case LTC3208_CHAN_BLUE:
> + return ltc3208_led_set_current_low(regmap, LTC3208_REG_B_AUXBLU, current_level);
> + case LTC3208_CHAN_CAMH:
> + return ltc3208_led_set_current_high(regmap, LTC3208_REG_F_CAM, current_level);
> + case LTC3208_CHAN_CAML:
> + return ltc3208_led_set_current_low(regmap, LTC3208_REG_F_CAM, current_level);
> + case LTC3208_CHAN_GREEN:
> + return ltc3208_led_set_current_high(regmap, LTC3208_REG_A_GRNRED, current_level);
> + case LTC3208_CHAN_RED:
> + return ltc3208_led_set_current_low(regmap, LTC3208_REG_A_GRNRED, current_level);
> + default:
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Invalid LED Channel\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int ltc3208_update_options(struct ltc3208_dev *dev,
> + bool is_sub, bool is_cam_hi, bool is_rgb_drop)
> +{
Since this helper function only has one call site, should we inline its logic
directly into the probe function to reduce superfluous abstractions?
> + struct regmap *map = dev->map;
> + u8 val;
> +
> + val = FIELD_PREP(LTC3208_OPT_EN_RGBS, is_sub) |
> + FIELD_PREP(LTC3208_OPT_DIS_CAMHILO, is_cam_hi) |
> + FIELD_PREP(LTC3208_OPT_DIS_RGBDROP, is_rgb_drop);
> +
> + return regmap_write(map, LTC3208_REG_G_OPT, val);
> +}
> +
> +static int ltc3208_update_aux_dac(struct ltc3208_dev *dev, enum ltc3208_aux_channel *aux_chan)
> +{
Similarly, as this function is only called once, could we inline its logic into
the probe function?
> + struct regmap *map = dev->map;
> + u8 val;
> +
> + val = FIELD_PREP(LTC3208_AUX1_MASK, aux_chan[0]) |
> + FIELD_PREP(LTC3208_AUX2_MASK, aux_chan[1]) |
> + FIELD_PREP(LTC3208_AUX3_MASK, aux_chan[2]) |
> + FIELD_PREP(LTC3208_AUX4_MASK, aux_chan[3]);
> +
> + return regmap_write(map, LTC3208_REG_E_AUX_SELECT, val);
> +}
> +
> +static int ltc3208_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + enum ltc3208_aux_channel aux_channels[LTC3208_NUM_AUX_LEDS];
> + struct ltc3208_dev *dev_data;
Consistency.
> + struct ltc3208_led *leds;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + int ret;
> + u32 val;
'val' is a weak variable name. How about 'chan'?
> + bool dropdis_rgb_aux4;
> + bool dis_camhl;
> + bool en_rgbs;
All of these variable names are non-forthcoming.
Please improve the nomenclature of each of them.
> + regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, <c3208_regmap_cfg);
> + if (IS_ERR(regmap))
> + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, PTR_ERR(regmap),
> + "Failed to initialize regmap\n");
> +
> + dev_data = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*dev_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dev_data)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + leds = devm_kcalloc(&client->dev, LTC3208_NUM_LED_GRPS,
> + sizeof(struct ltc3208_led), GFP_KERNEL)u
> + if (!leds)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + dev_data->client = client;
> + dev_data->map = regmap;
> +
> + dis_camhl = device_property_read_bool(&client->dev, "adi,disable-camhl-pin");
> + en_rgbs = device_property_read_bool(&client->dev, "adi,cfg-enrgbs-pin");
> + dropdis_rgb_aux4 = device_property_read_bool(&client->dev, "adi,disable-rgb-aux4-dropout");
> +
> + ret = ltc3208_update_options(dev_data, en_rgbs, dis_camhl,
> + dropdis_rgb_aux4);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret, "error writing to options register\n");
> +
> + /* Initialize aux channel configurations from devicetree */
No need to shorten words in comments and drop the "from devicetree"
part. It doesn't really add anything.
> + for (int i = 0; i < LTC3208_NUM_AUX_LEDS; i++) {
> + ret = device_property_match_property_string(&client->dev,
> + ltc3208_dt_aux_channels[i],
> + ltc3208_aux_opt,
> + LTC3208_NUM_AUX_OPT);
> + /* Use default value if absent in devicetree */
"Fall-back to default value if not found"
> + if (ret == -EINVAL)
> + aux_channels[i] = LTC3208_AUX_CHAN_AUX;
> + else if (ret >= 0)
> + aux_channels[i] = ret;
> + else
> + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret,
> + "Failed getting aux-channel %d\n", i);
"Failed to set the auxiliary channel"
But when would this happen?
If we have an acceptable default value, why not use it?
> + }
> +
> + ret = ltc3208_update_aux_dac(dev_data, aux_channels);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret, "error writing to aux channel register.\n");
> +
> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, dev_data);
> +
> + device_for_each_child_node_scoped(&client->dev, child) {
> + struct ltc3208_led *led;
> + struct led_init_data init_data = {};
> +
> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &val);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, -EINVAL,
> + "Failed to get reg value of LED.\n");
Could we propagate the original error code returned by
'fwnode_property_read_u32' instead of hard-coding '-EINVAL' here?
> + else if (val >= LTC3208_NUM_LED_GRPS)
> + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, -EINVAL,
> + "LED reg value not supported.\n");
"LED channel out of range" ?
> +
> + led = &leds[val];
> + led->client = client;
> + led->channel = val;
> + led->cdev.brightness_set_blocking = ltc3208_led_set_brightness;
> + led->cdev.max_brightness = LTC3208_MAX_BRIGHTNESS_4BIT;
Nit: '\n' here.
> + if (val == LTC3208_CHAN_MAIN || val == LTC3208_CHAN_SUB)
> + led->cdev.max_brightness = LTC3208_MAX_BRIGHTNESS_8BIT;
> +
> + init_data.fwnode = child;
> +
> + ret = devm_led_classdev_register_ext(&client->dev, &led->cdev,
> + &init_data);
Surely this is shorter than the one 2 lines down? Use 100-chars throughout.
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret, "Failed to register LED %u\n", val);
> + }
> +
> + dev_data->leds = leds;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id ltc3208_match_table[] = {
> + {.compatible = "adi,ltc3208"},
Spaces between the '{' and '}'.
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ltc3208_match_table);
> +
> +static const struct i2c_device_id ltc3208_idtable[] = {
> + { "ltc3208" },
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ltc3208_idtable);
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver ltc3208_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "ltc3208",
> + .of_match_table = ltc3208_match_table,
> + },
> + .id_table = ltc3208_idtable,
> + .probe = ltc3208_probe,
> +};
> +module_i2c_driver(ltc3208_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Jan Carlo Roleda <jancarlo.roleda@analog.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("LTC3208 LED Driver");
--
Lee Jones
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-16 2:39 [PATCH v4 0/2] Add support for LTC3208 multi-display driver Jan Carlo Roleda
2026-04-16 2:39 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: Document LTC3208 Multidisplay LED Driver Jan Carlo Roleda
2026-04-16 8:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-16 2:39 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] leds: ltc3208: Add driver for " Jan Carlo Roleda
2026-04-30 15:05 ` Lee Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260430150508.GK1806155@google.com \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jancarlo.roleda@analog.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox