From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E1723A4510;
	Tue, 12 May 2026 23:13:17 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1778627598; cv=none; b=nU9bNd+vaNFFkT1G4O/k+8JbJ/HEAvWxbzub0pYjETnLVmrDUgdUPcMEo/SayuJSIh57MEExJQc/giVQYkw6H+PlbWxBb8rbMf7+YS0t8IiWmqoMn6nDZXLqBxgADWVc7Gqf0gwNDfAqqky0rvC128zcsXZ2bDK/qJpaqtjpFlY=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1778627598; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=7y5ERZ+46G5TuZ6kypctntsWjjmLUBio5KVlVFgY9Zw=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:
	 MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=q0tSxDSUQqFlKx/SYGMJ7XEOZ447qxgDHu+7p9YGOIFVjXB8TeU7hpgO/pylOvNS+ak9mD1TYyv+ipVLblfXJr9ZsWLsT2ZnEkOQuWM9QQugRNXqpeM2khDr2J6zdkbQIWFeZqAw91prGxR28i1amo/KDiwqDLO/4suVOLluY9k=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=L8ix4T7L; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="L8ix4T7L"
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88E9CC2BCB0;
	Tue, 12 May 2026 23:13:16 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
	s=k20201202; t=1778627597;
	bh=7y5ERZ+46G5TuZ6kypctntsWjjmLUBio5KVlVFgY9Zw=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=L8ix4T7LumVzKwTGAmGHMrwUukpsAmAzFvnrLz0XdT9IECAVpIFPzI8JAdwAjELFb
	 eEOXvwRJm5nKwiHf/5bwAazCxNLpjjYIURLL8u5VLa2jLpFYeCMrf0TzKNrnZcgJ3k
	 b1lCRWWmuNb7/GLTRAnrSQXC0w+Xf2ly6Yt7jub737/bcoKACKWpPLlF+VCL8d8bld
	 +ASIw4J2jCQZw86XzI2rfrgQWBcvoQF4p6LyjzYRgVlHTseYTsHE0RaF3T6I2k9mJZ
	 OwdU7ctOnJp0Ts89wGEA+Md1HUBm4TJwDahotDhq1bYxG1AgaLLYqPhajGxV8kGAQ9
	 YJQWeT5Ho3mBg==
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 16:13:15 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: =?UTF-8?B?5p2O5b+X?= <lizhi2@eswincomputing.com>
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
 edumazet@google.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
 conor+dt@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
 mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
 rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk, pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
 aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
 linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, ningyu@eswincomputing.com,
 linmin@eswincomputing.com, pinkesh.vaghela@einfochips.com,
 pritesh.patel@einfochips.com, weishangjuan@eswincomputing.com,
 horms@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 2/4] net: stmmac: eic7700: enable clocks
 before syscon access and correct RX sampling timing
Message-ID: <20260512161315.141aba88@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <446f69bd.7fe4.19e1ab248fb.Coremail.lizhi2@eswincomputing.com>
References: <20260427072353.1114-1-lizhi2@eswincomputing.com>
	<20260427072508.1151-1-lizhi2@eswincomputing.com>
	<20260428180625.738223cf@kernel.org>
	<2117464.7991.19ddd2125d1.Coremail.lizhi2@eswincomputing.com>
	<20260430163551.7491407a@kernel.org>
	<38d052b7.7a70.19dfb0d782b.Coremail.lizhi2@eswincomputing.com>
	<446f69bd.7fe4.19e1ab248fb.Coremail.lizhi2@eswincomputing.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <devicetree.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:devicetree+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:devicetree+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 12 May 2026 13:39:12 +0800 (GMT+08:00) =E6=9D=8E=E5=BF=97 wrote:
> For the eth1 enablement part, my current understanding is that it
> should be treated as a new independent v1 series for net-next,
> since the scope and target tree have changed after the split.
>=20
> Would you prefer this eth1 series to start as v1, or should it
> continue as v8 for continuity with the original series?

v8 is better, but is the fix in net-next already?

If this is the posting you're referring to:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260507083214.192-1-lizhi2@eswincomputing.com/
it has been dropped based on feedback from Maxime and I don't see a v2.