From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pawel Laszczak via B4 Relay" <devnull+pawell.cadence.com@kernel.org>
Cc: krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] usb: cdnsp: Add support for device-only configuration
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 05:08:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260514050811.B4D80C2BCB7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513-b4-no_drd_config-v6-2-e7789cd0e581@cadence.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Uninitialized variable `ret` is returned from `cdns_drd_host_on` when `cdns->no_drd` is true.
- [High] Error path in `cdnsp_pci_probe()` conditionally frees a shared `wrap` structure, leading to a use-after-free and double-free vulnerability.
- [High] Concurrent execution of `cdnsp_pci_probe()` for both PCI functions causes a NULL pointer dereference due to lockless synchronization.
--
commit ced8f360cae2b8973233c3e0a1eebbd2eb3a4cc6
Author: Pawel Laszczak <pawell@cadence.com>
usb: cdnsp: Add support for device-only configuration
This commit introduces support for the Cadence USBSSP (cdnsp) controller
in hardware configurations where the Dual-Role Device (DRD) register
block is not implemented or inaccessible, forcing the driver to rely on
a fixed peripheral or host mode.
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/cdns3/cdnsp-pci.c b/drivers/usb/cdns3/cdnsp-pci.c
> index 432007cfe6954..feb9162298709 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/cdns3/cdnsp-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/cdns3/cdnsp-pci.c
> @@ -93,7 +104,7 @@ static int cdnsp_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>
> pci_set_master(pdev);
>
> - if (pci_is_enabled(func)) {
> + if (func && pci_is_enabled(func)) {
> wrap = pci_get_drvdata(func);
> } else {
> wrap = kzalloc_obj(*wrap);
Is it possible for the Host and OTG PCI functions to be probed concurrently?
If the first thread observes pci_is_enabled(func) as true because the
second thread just enabled it, but the second thread hasn't yet reached
pci_set_drvdata() at the end of its probe, could pci_get_drvdata() return
NULL here?
This would cause a NULL pointer dereference when accessing wrap->dev_res
further down.
[ ... ]
> @@ -158,6 +182,7 @@ static int cdnsp_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> plat_info.dma_mask = pdev->dma_mask;
> plat_info.data = &pdata;
> plat_info.size_data = sizeof(pdata);
> + plat_info.properties = wrap->prop;
> wrap->devfn = pdev->devfn;
> /* register platform device */
> wrap->plat_dev = platform_device_register_full(&plat_info);
If the second function (OTG) retrieves a shared wrap structure allocated by
the first function (Host), and platform_device_register_full() fails, the
error path will execute kfree(wrap).
Does this create a dangling pointer in the first function's drvdata, leading
to a use-after-free or double-free later when the first function is removed?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/cdns3/drd.c b/drivers/usb/cdns3/drd.c
> index 84fb38a5723a3..f87cf85cb97a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/cdns3/drd.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/cdns3/drd.c
> @@ -181,6 +184,9 @@ int cdns_drd_host_on(struct cdns *cdns)
> u32 val, ready_bit;
> int ret;
>
> + if (cdns->no_drd)
> + goto phy_set;
> +
> /* Enable host mode. */
> writel(OTGCMD_HOST_BUS_REQ | OTGCMD_OTG_DIS,
[ ... ]
> @@ -197,6 +203,7 @@ int cdns_drd_host_on(struct cdns *cdns)
> if (ret)
> dev_err(cdns->dev, "timeout waiting for xhci_ready\n");
>
> +phy_set:
> phy_set_mode(cdns->usb2_phy, PHY_MODE_USB_HOST);
> phy_set_mode(cdns->usb3_phy, PHY_MODE_USB_HOST);
> return ret;
When cdns->no_drd is true, execution jumps to the phy_set label, bypassing
the initialization of the local variable ret.
Could this return uninitialized stack memory and cause callers like
cdns_role_start() to see a spurious failure and unexpectedly abort the host
role startup?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260513-b4-no_drd_config-v6-0-e7789cd0e581@cadence.com?part=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 11:44 [PATCH v6 0/2] usb: cdns3: support configurations without DRD block Pawel Laszczak via B4 Relay
2026-05-13 11:44 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: cdns3: Add no_drd property Pawel Laszczak via B4 Relay
2026-05-13 18:59 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-14 4:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 11:44 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] usb: cdnsp: Add support for device-only configuration Pawel Laszczak via B4 Relay
2026-05-14 5:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260514050811.B4D80C2BCB7@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devnull+pawell.cadence.com@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox