From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Richard Acayan" <mailingradian@gmail.com>
Cc: krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm670-google: add common device tree include
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 08:08:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260514080816.67F5AC2BCB7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513172549.1345-2-mailingradian@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The newly added common device tree file uses the deprecated GPL-2.0 SPDX identifier, contradicting the commit message.
- [Low] The `framebuffer` node retains a unit address in its name without a `reg` property, which triggers a dtc warning.
--
commit 1f4f677fcfc2b6d8ad7bf836706a7501c4b2897b
Author: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>
arm64: dts: qcom: sdm670-google: add common device tree include
This commit extracts the common elements from the Pixel 3a device tree into
a shared include file to support the Pixel 3a XL. It also rewrites the
original device tree to specify only non-XL properties.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm670-google-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm670-google-common.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..0f57b915186b7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm670-google-common.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,712 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
The commit message mentions changing the SPDX license identifier from GPL-2.0
to GPL-2.0-only, but this new common include file still uses GPL-2.0. Was
this an oversight when creating the new file?
[ ... ]
> + chosen {
> + stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> +
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + framebuffer: framebuffer@9c000000 {
> + compatible = "simple-framebuffer";
> + memory-region = <&fb_mem>;
> + width = <1080>;
Since the reg property was replaced with a memory-region reference, should
the @9c000000 unit address be removed from the node name to prevent a dtc
warning about a node having a unit name but no reg property?
Additionally, are the #address-cells, #size-cells, and ranges properties in
the parent chosen node still necessary now that the child node no longer
uses a reg property?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260513172549.1345-1-mailingradian@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 17:25 [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: pixel 3a xl support with tianma panel Richard Acayan
2026-05-13 17:25 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm670-google: add common device tree include Richard Acayan
2026-05-13 17:57 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-05-14 8:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-13 17:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: add support for pixel 3a xl with the tianma panel Richard Acayan
2026-05-13 17:58 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260514080816.67F5AC2BCB7@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=mailingradian@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox