From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rudraksha Gupta via B4 Relay" <devnull+guptarud.gmail.com@kernel.org>
Cc: krzk+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: saw2: Rename MSM8960 SAW2 compatible to v1.1
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 16:19:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260514161937.2C9B5C2BCB3@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260514-expressatt_cpufreq-v1-1-487fd2d78859@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] ABI breakage and broken bisectability: The patch removes the existing 'qcom,msm8960-saw2-cpu' compatible string from the YAML binding without retaining it.
--
commit 5f6f37c2425f00a08baf814227401f4026243b11
Author: Rudraksha Gupta <guptarud@gmail.com>
dt-bindings: soc: qcom: saw2: Rename MSM8960 SAW2 compatible to v1.1
This commit renames the qcom,msm8960-saw2-cpu compatible string to
qcom,msm8960-saw2-v1.1-cpu in the SAW2 bindings. The change aligns the
MSM8960 naming convention with other SAW2 compatibles that explicitly
include their hardware version.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,saw2.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,saw2.yaml
> index c2f1f5946cfaa..ff0e2697a7c60 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,saw2.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,saw2.yaml
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ properties:
> - qcom,msm8939-saw2-v3.0-cpu
> - qcom,msm8226-saw2-v2.1-cpu
> - qcom,msm8226-saw2-v2.1-l2
> - - qcom,msm8960-saw2-cpu
> + - qcom,msm8960-saw2-v1.1-cpu
Will removing the older compatible string break backward compatibility for
existing device tree blobs that rely on it? Standard practice is usually
to retain the old string, sometimes marked as deprecated, to preserve the
binding ABI.
Also, since the in-tree device tree files still use the old string until
they are updated in a later commit in the series, does this removal cause
make dtbs_check to fail at this exact commit, breaking bisectability?
> - qcom,msm8974-saw2-v2.1-cpu
> - qcom,msm8974-saw2-v2.1-l2
> - qcom,msm8976-gold-saw2-v2.3-l2
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260514-expressatt_cpufreq-v1-0-487fd2d78859@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-14 7:03 [PATCH 0/3] Add cpufreq to MSM8960 Rudraksha Gupta via B4 Relay
2026-05-14 7:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: saw2: Rename MSM8960 SAW2 compatible to v1.1 Rudraksha Gupta via B4 Relay
2026-05-14 16:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-14 7:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] soc: qcom: spm: Add MSM8960 SAW2 CPU support Rudraksha Gupta via B4 Relay
2026-05-14 17:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-14 7:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8960: Add CPU frequency scaling support Rudraksha Gupta via B4 Relay
2026-05-14 18:07 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260514161937.2C9B5C2BCB3@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devnull+guptarud.gmail.com@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox