From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D59388E4D; Fri, 15 May 2026 06:51:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778827904; cv=none; b=f3h2wjewkdPslx4Ta/Dyg2AvioJqlcwddr9lKakja9HaPc281POUIUNmQwdfIYpfpkveic4CC1P4nTfWi5rJfAcW7gv23e6avAyZQSYEFw2ipqtiXVblW2kZvZ3fQvhx/boUdGX9KwfEJrwAXx/DTSNDKVeaL3pjNdAV08Qmi74= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778827904; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xetCbQQicxOnxA/cAWCBNjO1sljv2AqnFgNenly9yms=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lKRyrPezksswldCkyhcfmO8iWsPvTBbfQwzpZ/4yBZIFRBTj5u6epssPHmbSViXcPLypo75gW3gdU2bd2Cye6MzGTWmWorlBhSt/5h7QGh0Up+WJ4e/J3MNtKuog6Q+vrWWBiHvNo3H+5pF1ofLEuaquH5j6nZgYyAFGJhHAF0g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=krXJuO9n; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="krXJuO9n" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B52DC2BCB0; Fri, 15 May 2026 06:51:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778827903; bh=xetCbQQicxOnxA/cAWCBNjO1sljv2AqnFgNenly9yms=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=krXJuO9ndCrzCUWxfwt6siUoaECBWzO7J6x035a9dcURhIVBefNNnH4pZUv2aKhf3 80KyKhGxol1OUXWU4jwiqFj6ZfRQ+21TaszZO/xevTwbwbrrOYL0tpcTfVlTOAH/wx V7/j2I8tIZ1Ifxi/wzYtObXtCHRVF9OUrkkMJCteQ9FDsltRuESAIMQdPY5BWlBeec a60j3O88yB6W3BoAmEcmsyostQgj9CfXIXUg/RpSeb2FzK2Tq4HYBRiHDCEpTdqzJg WeEZouBq5ijvovq6UCrDlC+eH+qPOjS9M0BFRZU+jqjdJxQ6ENrZsgh30yLaqFwkz3 Y22hpb8m1qeWg== Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 08:51:41 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Tomi Valkeinen Cc: Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Lee Jones , Aradhya Bhatia , Nishanth Menon , Vignesh Raghavendra , Swamil Jain , Devarsh Thakkar , Louis Chauvet , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] dt-bindings: display: ti,am65x-dss: Simplify binding Message-ID: <20260515-hidden-devout-numbat-dc6c9e@quoll> References: <20260513-beagley-ai-display-v2-0-9e9bcefde6bc@ideasonboard.com> <20260513-beagley-ai-display-v2-2-9e9bcefde6bc@ideasonboard.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260513-beagley-ai-display-v2-2-9e9bcefde6bc@ideasonboard.com> On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 04:17:24PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > In principle the DT binding for the DSS IP should mainly cover the DSS > IP. The current binding also covers the SoC integration topics outside > the DSS, mainly via the endpoint related rules and descriptions. > > A more recent SoC, AM62P, has two instances of the DSS IP, and while > both DSS IPs are identical, they are integrated slightly differently > (e.g. which DSS output goes to an in-SoC DSI bridge, which goes to > DPI pins, etc.). > > To make the bindings usable for both DSS instances, relax the binding > slightly: remove the explicit endpoint rules, and generalize the > descriptions. > > Reviewed-by: "Rob Herring (Arm)" > Tested-by: Swamil Jain Same comments. Best regards, Krzysztof