From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 4/6] pinctrl: add NXP MC33978/MC34978 pinctrl driver
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 18:07:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260515180705.C32BAC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515160537.115808-5-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The `cached_bias` and `cached_drive` arrays independently cache the same physical hardware state (`MC33978_REG_CONFIG`), leading to conflicting state restoration when changing GPIO direction.
--
commit ae57c2734af81a36d2a256fc43f258b7210de10a
Author: David Jander <david@protonic.nl>
pinctrl: add NXP MC33978/MC34978 pinctrl driver
Add pin control and GPIO driver for the NXP MC33978/MC34978 Multiple Switch
Detection Interface (MSDI) devices. This driver translates physical switch
states to logical GPIO levels, emulates outputs via hardware tri-state,
and implements a hierarchical irq_chip for interrupt routing.
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mc33978.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mc33978.c
> index 0000000000000..2ee1b1284c87a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mc33978.c
[ ... ]
> +struct mc33978_pinctrl {
[ ... ]
> + enum mc33978_bias_state cached_bias[MC33978_NGPIO];
> + enum mc33978_drive_mode cached_drive[MC33978_NGPIO];
> +};
Does the separation of cached_bias and cached_drive lead to conflicting
state restoration?
Both arrays appear to independently cache the same physical hardware state
(MC33978_REG_CONFIG) for SP pins:
[ ... ]
> +static int mc33978_set_drive(struct mc33978_pinctrl *mpc, unsigned int pin,
> + enum mc33978_drive_mode mode)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + ret = mc33978_update_bits(mpc, MC33978_REG_CONFIG, mask,
> + (mode == MC33978_OPEN_DRAIN) ? mask : 0);
> + if (!ret)
> + mpc->cached_drive[pin] = mode;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
When mc33978_set_drive() updates MC33978_REG_CONFIG and cached_drive,
cached_bias is left stale.
[ ... ]
> +static int mc33978_set_pull(struct mc33978_pinctrl *mpc, unsigned int pin,
> + enum mc33978_bias_state val)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + /* Configure direction (Exclusively for SP pins) */
> + if (mc33978_is_sp(pin) && val != MC33978_TRISTATE) {
> + ret = mc33978_update_bits(mpc, MC33978_REG_CONFIG, mask,
> + (val == MC33978_PD) ? mask : 0);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* Enable current source or set to tri-state */
> + ret = mc33978_update_bits(mpc, mc33978_spsg(MC33978_REG_TRI_SP, pin),
> + mask,
> + (val == MC33978_TRISTATE) ? mask : 0);
> + if (!ret)
> + mpc->cached_bias[pin] = val;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
Similarly, when mc33978_set_pull() updates MC33978_REG_CONFIG and
cached_bias, cached_drive is left stale.
[ ... ]
> +static int mc33978_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> + struct mc33978_pinctrl *mpc = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&mpc->lock);
[ ... ]
> + return mc33978_set_pull(mpc, offset, mpc->cached_bias[offset]);
> +}
If mc33978_direction_input() unconditionally restores cached_bias, could
this write back stale MC33978_REG_CONFIG data, clobbering a recently
configured output drive mode?
[ ... ]
> +static int mc33978_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
> + int value)
> +{
> + struct mc33978_pinctrl *mpc = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> + u32 mask = BIT(offset);
> + u32 bits = value ? mask : 0;
> + int ret;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&mpc->lock);
> +
> + ret = mc33978_set_drive(mpc, offset, mpc->cached_drive[offset]);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return mc33978_update_tri_state(mpc, mask, bits);
> +}
And likewise, could mc33978_direction_output() clobber the pinctrl bias
setting when it restores the potentially stale cached_drive?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260515160537.115808-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-15 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 16:05 [PATCH v12 0/6] mfd: Add support for NXP MC33978/MC34978 MSDI Oleksij Rempel
2026-05-15 16:05 ` [PATCH v12 1/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: add " Oleksij Rempel
2026-05-15 16:05 ` [PATCH v12 2/6] mfd: add NXP MC33978/MC34978 core driver Oleksij Rempel
2026-05-15 16:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-15 16:05 ` [PATCH v12 3/6] pinctrl: core: Make pin group callbacks optional for pin-only drivers Oleksij Rempel
2026-05-15 17:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-15 16:05 ` [PATCH v12 4/6] pinctrl: add NXP MC33978/MC34978 pinctrl driver Oleksij Rempel
2026-05-15 18:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-15 16:05 ` [PATCH v12 5/6] hwmon: add NXP MC33978/MC34978 driver Oleksij Rempel
2026-05-15 18:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-15 16:05 ` [PATCH v12 6/6] mux: add NXP MC33978/MC34978 AMUX driver Oleksij Rempel
2026-05-15 19:07 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260515180705.C32BAC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox